Re: citations of nature
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 05:17:46 GMT
Message-ID: <_r6Kb.8802$6B.884_at_newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>
"mountain man" <hobbit_at_southern_seaweed.com.op> wrote in message
news:G83Kb.77896$aT.48598_at_news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote in message
> news:Z8Cdnat3hPU0b2qiRVn-vg_at_golden.net...
> > "Marshall Spight" <mspight_at_dnai.com> wrote in message
> > news:uFOJb.52423$I07.174447_at_attbi_s53...
> > > "Dawn M. Wolthuis" <dwolt_at_tincat-group.com> wrote in message
> > news:bt7n7f$iq5$1_at_news.netins.net...
> > > >
> > > > The definition I'm currently using is:
> > > > Database: Retrievable data encoded on a persistent storage device
> > combined
> > > > with metadata - information about that data.
> > >
> > > I think that too much thinking these days goes into the "persistence"
> > part.
> >
> > Sheesh! What nonsense! Compare the complex jargon above with Darwen's
> > observation that "A database is a set of facts."
> >
> So what is a "fact"?
> An element of data?
>
> How might this definition deal with program objects
> (such as stored procedures) in the database?
>
You may want to read through the following, to get an idea of what a database is.
http://www.dbpd.com/vault/9807date.htm
-- - Anith ( Please reply to newsgroups only )Received on Mon Jan 05 2004 - 06:17:46 CET