Re: relations aren't types?
From: Alfredo Novoa <alfredo_at_ncs.es>
Date: 2 Jan 2004 03:05:36 -0800
Message-ID: <e4330f45.0401020305.58b53027_at_posting.google.com>
Date: 2 Jan 2004 03:05:36 -0800
Message-ID: <e4330f45.0401020305.58b53027_at_posting.google.com>
"Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote in message news:<EfOdnSWVnOSbXGmi4p2dnA_at_golden.net>...
> > From TTM: A scalar type is a type with no user-visible components.
>
> Which in TTM is every type. Since scalar encompasses everything, why even
> mention it?
It is not every type. There are also array types, relation types, tuple types, etc, etc.
Regards
Alfredo
Received on Fri Jan 02 2004 - 12:05:36 CET