Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: citations of nature

Re: citations of nature

From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_golden.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 06:01:34 -0500
Message-ID: <Z8Cdnat3hPU0b2qiRVn-vg@golden.net>


"Marshall Spight" <mspight_at_dnai.com> wrote in message news:uFOJb.52423$I07.174447_at_attbi_s53...
> "Dawn M. Wolthuis" <dwolt_at_tincat-group.com> wrote in message
news:bt7n7f$iq5$1_at_news.netins.net...
> >
> > The definition I'm currently using is:
> > Database: Retrievable data encoded on a persistent storage device
combined
> > with metadata - information about that data.
>
> I think that too much thinking these days goes into the "persistence"
part.

Sheesh! What nonsense! Compare the complex jargon above with Darwen's observation that "A database is a set of facts." Received on Sun Jan 04 2004 - 05:01:34 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US