Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?
From: Paul Vernon <paul.vernon_at_ukk.ibmm.comm>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 20:14:58 -0000
Message-ID: <buk2e9$1qgm$1_at_gazette.almaden.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 20:14:58 -0000
Message-ID: <buk2e9$1qgm$1_at_gazette.almaden.ibm.com>
"Mike Sherrill" <MSherrillnonono_at_compuserve.com> wrote in message
news:t4cq00t1tv6o43pq6k6nm9dg30s31qqpp4_at_4ax.com...
> On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 03:42:37 GMT, "Marshall Spight" <mspight_at_dnai.com>
> wrote:
>
> >And I certainly haven't seen any evidence of legitimate challenges to
> >orthodoxy being anything *other than* marginalized, here in this
> >unmoderated group.
>
> What does a "legitimate challenge to orthodoxy" look like?
What does "orthodoxy" look like in database theory?
I thought we had many different denominations, never mind the non-relational religions.
:-)
Regards
Paul Vernon
Business Intelligence, IBM Global Services
Received on Tue Jan 20 2004 - 21:14:58 CET