Re: Interested in a moderated theory forum?

"Marshall Spight" <mspight_at_dnai.com> wrote in message news:Ns1Pb.104493$na.61237_at_attbi_s04...
> "Paul G. Brown" <paul_geoffrey_brown_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:57da7b56.0401191901.370e0d37_at_posting.google.com...
> >
> > Look, if folk want to create a moderated forum to discuss database
theory
> > no one is going to stand in their way. I'm just saying that moderation
(in
> > the e-list context) brings its own problems; you lose your more
colorful
> > characters, and legitimate challenges to orthodoxy can be
marginalized.
>
> To my way of thinking, "colorful" is no asset, if it's just a code-word
for "rude."
>
> And I certainly haven't seen any evidence of legitimate challenges to
> orthodoxy being anything *other than* marginalized, here in this
> unmoderated group.

And I certainly haven't seen any evidence of legitimate challenges to orthodoxy. The illegitimate challenges deserve marginalization. Received on Tue Jan 20 2004 - 05:10:50 CET