Re: Nested sets, BOM, with many roots?

From: Paul <paul_at_not.a.chance.ie>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 23:12:44 -0000
Message-ID: <MPG.1a63ffc4717e98e989880_at_news1.eircom.net>

troels_at_arvin.dk says...

> > That link is down (at least for me, using IE6, at 20:11 from Dublin,
> > Ireland) - anyone?

> Try again. It should be up now.

Thanks - good page - bookmarked!

Paul...

-- 
plinehan  y_a_h_o_o  and d_o_t  com
C++ Builder 5 SP1, Interbase 6.0.1.6 IBX 5.04 W2K Pro
Please do not top-post.

"XML avoids the fundamental question of what we should do, 
by focusing entirely on how we should do it." 

quote from http://www.metatorial.com

Received on Tue Jan 06 2004 - 00:12:44 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: shannon: "equivalence of functional dependencies"
Previous message: Lauri Pietarinen: "Re: Scalars & atomic values & variables"
Maybe in reply to: Mike MacSween: "Nested sets, BOM, with many roots?"
In reply to Paul: "Re: Nested sets, BOM, with many roots?"
Next in thread: Mike Sherrill: "Re: Recursive join - blind alley?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message