comp.databases.theory: by thread

Re: citations of nature Anith Sen (Tue Jan 06 2004 - 23:30:02 CST)
Re: citations of nature Bob Badour (Tue Jan 06 2004 - 02:15:14 CST)
- Re: citations of nature mountain man (Tue Jan 06 2004 - 18:47:37 CST)
Re: citations of nature Bob Badour (Mon Jan 05 2004 - 02:48:54 CST)
Re: citations of nature mountain man (Tue Jan 06 2004 - 05:44:01 CST)
Re: citations of nature mountain man (Tue Jan 06 2004 - 02:36:14 CST)
Re: citations of nature Adrian Kubala (Tue Jan 06 2004 - 15:35:18 CST)
Re: citations of nature Adrian Kubala (Tue Jan 06 2004 - 15:24:49 CST)
Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Tue Jan 06 2004 - 02:02:27 CST)
- Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Tue Jan 06 2004 - 12:34:58 CST)
  - Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Wed Jan 07 2004 - 21:47:37 CST)
    - Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Thu Jan 08 2004 - 10:41:43 CST)
      - Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Thu Jan 08 2004 - 14:23:46 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Thu Jan 08 2004 - 22:14:54 CST)
  - Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Thu Jan 08 2004 - 20:11:04 CST)
    - Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Thu Jan 08 2004 - 23:42:02 CST)
      - Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Fri Jan 09 2004 - 13:35:48 CST)
    - Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Fri Jan 09 2004 - 10:47:34 CST)
      - Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Fri Jan 09 2004 - 12:46:47 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Fri Jan 09 2004 - 23:41:52 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Marshall Spight (Sat Jan 10 2004 - 13:50:10 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Sat Jan 10 2004 - 23:27:08 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Alfredo Novoa (Sun Jan 11 2004 - 06:38:36 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Sun Jan 11 2004 - 12:51:27 CST)
        Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Sat Jan 10 2004 - 17:25:57 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Sun Jan 11 2004 - 01:38:07 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Sun Jan 11 2004 - 17:18:52 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Joe \ (Sun Jan 11 2004 - 19:30:19 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 00:14:39 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 01:39:08 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Marshall Spight (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 11:05:22 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 16:04:04 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Marshall Spight (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 23:00:58 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Tue Jan 13 2004 - 00:32:57 CST)
        Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 16:03:32 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 16:45:20 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 17:27:09 CST)
        Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 23:51:49 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Tue Jan 13 2004 - 01:05:42 CST)
        Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 16:47:56 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Tue Jan 13 2004 - 00:13:10 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Tue Jan 13 2004 - 01:47:38 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Wed Jan 14 2004 - 00:11:20 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Wed Jan 14 2004 - 02:17:56 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Wed Jan 14 2004 - 21:43:47 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Joe \ (Wed Jan 14 2004 - 22:47:25 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Thu Jan 15 2004 - 00:44:02 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Costin Cozianu (Thu Jan 15 2004 - 15:52:45 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? John Jacob (Thu Jan 15 2004 - 22:04:39 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Marshall Spight (Thu Jan 15 2004 - 22:11:18 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Bob Badour (Thu Jan 15 2004 - 23:18:05 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Adrian Kubala (Thu Jan 15 2004 - 23:21:30 CST)
        
        Re: relations aren't types? Marshall Spight (Fri Jan 16 2004 - 01:32:41 CST)
Re: Recursive join - blind alley? Roger (Tue Jan 06 2004 - 06:45:47 CST)
- Re: Recursive join - blind alley? Mikito Harakiri (Tue Jan 06 2004 - 11:39:30 CST)
  - Re: Recursive join - blind alley? Roger (Tue Jan 06 2004 - 16:05:45 CST)
Re: Recursive join - blind alley? Mike Sherrill (Wed Jan 07 2004 - 05:41:08 CST)
Re: Recursive join - blind alley? Roger (Tue Jan 06 2004 - 05:06:31 CST)
Re: Two-valued logic Joe \ (Tue Jan 06 2004 - 20:21:30 CST)
Re: Two-valued logic Christopher Browne (Tue Jan 06 2004 - 22:21:46 CST)
Re: Domain Adrian Kubala (Tue Jan 06 2004 - 15:42:58 CST)
Re: mysql - How much disk space is used by indexes? mountain man (Tue Jan 06 2004 - 02:36:14 CST)
Re: equivalence of functional dependencies Jonathan Leffler (Tue Jan 06 2004 - 00:05:32 CST)
- Re: equivalence of functional dependencies shannon (Tue Jan 06 2004 - 15:48:17 CST)
  - Re: equivalence of functional dependencies Jonathan Leffler (Wed Jan 07 2004 - 00:21:22 CST)
    - Re: equivalence of functional dependencies Mark Johnson (Wed Jan 07 2004 - 06:34:34 CST)
  - Re: equivalence of functional dependencies Adrian Kubala (Thu Jan 08 2004 - 19:46:17 CST)
    - Re: equivalence of functional dependencies Jonathan Leffler (Thu Jan 08 2004 - 22:32:45 CST)
    - Re: equivalence of functional dependencies Bert Blink (Sat Jan 10 2004 - 15:44:08 CST)
Re: equivalence of functional dependencies Bob Badour (Tue Jan 06 2004 - 02:09:23 CST)
Re: B+ tree implementation Jonathan Leffler (Tue Jan 06 2004 - 00:08:41 CST)
Re: B+ tree implementation Paul (Tue Jan 06 2004 - 08:56:35 CST)
- Re: B+ tree implementation Daisy Han (Tue Jan 06 2004 - 18:48:09 CST)
  - Re: B+ tree implementation Corey Brown (Wed Jan 07 2004 - 11:06:01 CST)
    - Re: B+ tree implementation Paul (Thu Jan 08 2004 - 09:29:03 CST)
      - Re: B+ tree implementation Corey Brown (Thu Jan 08 2004 - 11:06:51 CST)
FAQ? mountain man (Tue Jan 06 2004 - 05:43:59 CST)
Would you like to get practical experience with a DBMS of a new generation? Alexander Lashenko (Tue Jan 06 2004 - 22:53:50 CST)