Home
->
Usenet
->
comp.databases.theory
-> by thread
comp.databases.theory: by thread
182 messages
:
Starting
Tue Oct 02 2007 - 01:11:24 CEST,
Ending
Wed Oct 31 2007 - 23:57:39 CET
This period
:
Most recent messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
I was made of fun of the last time I posted, but here goes..
Evan Keel
(Tue Oct 02 2007 - 01:11:24 CEST)
Re: I was made of fun of the last time I posted, but here goes..
Marshall
(Tue Oct 02 2007 - 03:00:22 CEST)
Re: I was made of fun of the last time I posted, but here goes..
mAsterdam
(Tue Oct 02 2007 - 09:19:21 CEST)
Re: I was made of fun of the last time I posted, but here goes..
Marshall
(Tue Oct 02 2007 - 16:29:58 CEST)
Re: I was made of fun of the last time I posted, but here goes..
JOG
(Thu Oct 04 2007 - 02:19:56 CEST)
Re: Schema Relationship Question
JOG
(Thu Oct 04 2007 - 02:15:13 CEST)
Re: Schema Relationship Question
Ed Prochak
(Thu Oct 04 2007 - 23:09:23 CEST)
Re: Schema Relationship Question
JamesHoward
(Fri Oct 05 2007 - 19:43:57 CEST)
Re: Setting up updatable views ?
JOG
(Thu Oct 04 2007 - 02:21:46 CEST)
Re: Setting up updatable views ?
Cimode
(Thu Oct 04 2007 - 13:21:11 CEST)
Re: Schema Relationship Question
David Portas
(Thu Oct 04 2007 - 02:27:35 CEST)
Re: XML storing and management
djmcmahon_at_gmail.com
(Fri Oct 05 2007 - 00:02:12 CEST)
Re: Book about query processing / query optimization searched
--CELKO--
(Fri Oct 05 2007 - 16:08:41 CEST)
Re: Book about query processing / query optimization searched
MeBuggyYouJane
(Sat Oct 13 2007 - 05:15:32 CEST)
Re: Book about query processing / query optimization searched
--CELKO--
(Sat Oct 13 2007 - 16:02:42 CEST)
Re: Book about query processing / query optimization searched
Cimode
(Sun Oct 14 2007 - 18:31:36 CEST)
Re: Setting up updatable views ?
-CELKO-
(Fri Oct 05 2007 - 18:13:22 CEST)
Re: Setting up updatable views ?
Jon Heggland
(Mon Oct 08 2007 - 08:36:35 CEST)
Re: Schema Relationship Question
David Portas
(Sat Oct 06 2007 - 20:55:13 CEST)
Re: separation of church and state?
Marshall
(Sun Oct 07 2007 - 01:34:21 CEST)
Re: separation of church and state?
Marshall
(Sun Oct 07 2007 - 09:38:14 CEST)
Re: separation of church and state?
Cimode
(Sun Oct 07 2007 - 13:28:54 CEST)
Re: separation of church and state?
Roy Hann
(Sun Oct 07 2007 - 14:05:56 CEST)
Re: separation of church and state?
Marshall
(Sun Oct 07 2007 - 18:21:01 CEST)
Re: separation of church and state?
Bob Badour
(Sun Oct 07 2007 - 23:00:02 CEST)
Re: separation of church and state?
Marshall
(Sun Oct 07 2007 - 18:21:53 CEST)
Re: separation of church and state?
David Cressey
(Mon Oct 08 2007 - 14:48:28 CEST)
Re: separation of church and state?
Bob Badour
(Mon Oct 08 2007 - 16:21:57 CEST)
Re: separation of church and state?
Bob Badour
(Mon Oct 08 2007 - 16:24:30 CEST)
Re: separation of church and state?
Cimode
(Tue Oct 09 2007 - 10:46:55 CEST)
Re: separation of church and state?
Bob Badour
(Mon Oct 08 2007 - 16:27:14 CEST)
Re: sql tables
David Cressey
(Thu Oct 11 2007 - 18:05:18 CEST)
Re: sql tables
Bob Badour
(Thu Oct 11 2007 - 18:21:04 CEST)
Re: sql tables
Roy Hann
(Thu Oct 11 2007 - 18:29:35 CEST)
Re: sql tables
David Cressey
(Thu Oct 11 2007 - 21:33:00 CEST)
Re: sql tables
David Cressey
(Thu Oct 11 2007 - 21:35:10 CEST)
Re: sql tables
David Cressey
(Thu Oct 11 2007 - 21:41:12 CEST)
Re: sql tables
Marshall
(Thu Oct 11 2007 - 23:20:50 CEST)
Re: sql tables
Roy Hann
(Thu Oct 11 2007 - 22:05:49 CEST)
Re: sql tables
David Cressey
(Thu Oct 11 2007 - 22:18:45 CEST)
Re: sql tables
Roy Hann
(Fri Oct 12 2007 - 00:02:12 CEST)
Re: Enterprise Data Architecture
Gene Wirchenko
(Fri Oct 12 2007 - 01:56:36 CEST)
Re: Enterprise Data Architecture
Bob Badour
(Fri Oct 12 2007 - 02:16:16 CEST)
Re: Enterprise Data Architecture
Gene Wirchenko
(Fri Oct 12 2007 - 04:21:48 CEST)
Re: Enterprise Data Architecture
Cimode
(Fri Oct 12 2007 - 10:21:37 CEST)
Re: Enterprise Data Architecture
Tony D
(Fri Oct 12 2007 - 12:38:29 CEST)
Re: Enterprise Data Architecture
Bob Badour
(Fri Oct 12 2007 - 13:05:06 CEST)
Re: Enterprise Data Architecture
Cimode
(Fri Oct 12 2007 - 14:01:36 CEST)
Re: Enterprise Data Architecture
Alfredo Novoa
(Tue Oct 16 2007 - 02:08:54 CEST)
Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?
David Portas
(Tue Oct 16 2007 - 13:03:13 CEST)
Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?
Ed Prochak
(Fri Oct 19 2007 - 05:57:17 CEST)
Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?
dutone
(Fri Oct 19 2007 - 20:34:08 CEST)
Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?
Cimode
(Mon Oct 22 2007 - 20:39:04 CEST)
Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?
dutone
(Fri Oct 19 2007 - 18:44:13 CEST)
Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?
David Cressey
(Tue Oct 16 2007 - 14:36:56 CEST)
Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?
dutone
(Fri Oct 19 2007 - 19:09:20 CEST)
Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?
Cimode
(Mon Oct 22 2007 - 20:38:00 CEST)
Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?
dutone
(Wed Oct 24 2007 - 07:59:13 CEST)
Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?
Cimode
(Wed Oct 24 2007 - 08:13:29 CEST)
Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?
TroyK
(Tue Oct 16 2007 - 21:59:33 CEST)
Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?
dutone
(Fri Oct 19 2007 - 19:21:08 CEST)
Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?
Cimode
(Sun Oct 21 2007 - 22:45:38 CEST)
Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?
dutone
(Mon Oct 22 2007 - 18:42:16 CEST)
Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?
Cimode
(Mon Oct 22 2007 - 20:33:32 CEST)
Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?
dutone
(Wed Oct 24 2007 - 08:55:40 CEST)
Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?
Cimode
(Wed Oct 24 2007 - 15:50:35 CEST)
Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?
Bob Badour
(Wed Oct 24 2007 - 15:57:22 CEST)
Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?
dutone
(Wed Oct 24 2007 - 18:44:02 CEST)
Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?
Bob Badour
(Wed Oct 24 2007 - 19:16:12 CEST)
Re: Enterprise Data Architecture
Gene Wirchenko
(Wed Oct 17 2007 - 00:21:28 CEST)
Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?
Roy Hann
(Wed Oct 17 2007 - 09:44:43 CEST)
Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?
dutone
(Fri Oct 19 2007 - 20:13:26 CEST)
Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?
Cimode
(Mon Oct 22 2007 - 20:41:26 CEST)
Re: Enterprise Data Architecture
Roy Hann
(Wed Oct 17 2007 - 17:09:51 CEST)
Re: New to the job
Ed Prochak
(Fri Oct 19 2007 - 06:06:57 CEST)
Re: separation of church and state?
Dr. Dweeb
(Fri Oct 19 2007 - 16:06:28 CEST)
Re: sql tables
Dr. Dweeb
(Fri Oct 19 2007 - 16:16:40 CEST)
Re: separation of church and state?
Dr. Dweeb
(Fri Oct 19 2007 - 16:21:18 CEST)
Re: separation of church and state?
Dr. Dweeb
(Fri Oct 19 2007 - 16:27:12 CEST)
Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?
David Portas
(Fri Oct 19 2007 - 21:58:26 CEST)
Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?
Cimode
(Mon Oct 22 2007 - 20:40:06 CEST)
Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?
David Cressey
(Wed Oct 24 2007 - 19:09:49 CEST)
Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?
Bob Badour
(Wed Oct 24 2007 - 19:14:27 CEST)
Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?
Cimode
(Wed Oct 24 2007 - 19:52:11 CEST)
Re: Types variables and values
Marshall
(Wed Oct 24 2007 - 19:40:50 CEST)
Re: Types variables and values
David BL
(Thu Oct 25 2007 - 05:33:04 CEST)
Re: Attribute-values in separate table
-CELKO-
(Sat Oct 27 2007 - 02:19:06 CEST)
Re: Attribute-values in separate table
DBMS_Plumber
(Mon Oct 29 2007 - 19:58:18 CET)
Re: Attribute-values in separate table
Frank Hamersley
(Tue Oct 30 2007 - 12:27:12 CET)
Re: Attribute-values in separate table
Brian Selzer
(Sat Oct 27 2007 - 09:02:51 CEST)
Re: Attribute-values in separate table
-CELKO-
(Sun Oct 28 2007 - 18:57:26 CET)
Re: Attribute-values in separate table
Roy Hann
(Sat Oct 27 2007 - 16:44:02 CEST)
Re: Attribute-values in separate table
Frank Hamersley
(Tue Oct 30 2007 - 12:12:22 CET)
Re: Attribute-values in separate table
Authorised User
(Tue Oct 30 2007 - 13:31:25 CET)
Re: Attribute-values in separate table
Bob Badour
(Tue Oct 30 2007 - 14:40:44 CET)
Re: Attribute-values in separate table
David Cressey
(Tue Oct 30 2007 - 15:21:48 CET)
Re: RM and abstract syntax trees
Bob Badour
(Wed Oct 31 2007 - 01:45:11 CET)
Re: RM and abstract syntax trees
Bob Badour
(Wed Oct 31 2007 - 04:03:55 CET)
Re: RM and abstract syntax trees
Marshall
(Wed Oct 31 2007 - 01:26:45 CET)
Re: RM and abstract syntax trees
Bob Badour
(Wed Oct 31 2007 - 01:59:23 CET)
Re: RM and abstract syntax trees
Marshall
(Wed Oct 31 2007 - 15:42:10 CET)
Re: RM and abstract syntax trees
Bob Badour
(Wed Oct 31 2007 - 15:51:16 CET)
Re: RM and abstract syntax trees
David BL
(Wed Oct 31 2007 - 01:34:48 CET)
Re: RM and abstract syntax trees
David BL
(Wed Oct 31 2007 - 03:00:29 CET)
Re: RM and abstract syntax trees
David BL
(Wed Oct 31 2007 - 13:53:33 CET)
Re: RM and abstract syntax trees
Marshall
(Wed Oct 31 2007 - 15:55:28 CET)
Re: RM and abstract syntax trees
David Cressey
(Wed Oct 31 2007 - 11:23:39 CET)
Re: RM and abstract syntax trees
David BL
(Wed Oct 31 2007 - 13:31:28 CET)
Re: RM and abstract syntax trees
Marshall
(Wed Oct 31 2007 - 15:48:40 CET)
Re: RM and abstract syntax trees
Bob Badour
(Wed Oct 31 2007 - 15:55:44 CET)
Re: Attribute-values in separate table
Authorised User
(Wed Oct 31 2007 - 11:27:03 CET)
Re: RM and abstract syntax trees
David Cressey
(Wed Oct 31 2007 - 14:27:04 CET)
Re: Circular relationship problem
Arash
(Wed Oct 31 2007 - 15:29:29 CET)
Re: RM and abstract syntax trees
David Cressey
(Wed Oct 31 2007 - 17:47:14 CET)
Re: RM and abstract syntax trees
Tegiri Nenashi
(Wed Oct 31 2007 - 23:23:21 CET)
Re: RM and abstract syntax trees
Gene Wirchenko
(Wed Oct 31 2007 - 23:57:39 CET)
Setting up updatable views ?
Cimode
(Tue Oct 02 2007 - 10:29:19 CEST)
Re: how to query for time based inventory status
Tonkuma
(Wed Oct 03 2007 - 21:33:57 CEST)
Schema Relationship Question
JamesHoward
(Wed Oct 03 2007 - 23:44:56 CEST)
Re: Book about query processing / query optimization searched
Cimode
(Thu Oct 04 2007 - 18:44:30 CEST)
Re: Book about query processing / query optimization searched
Cimode
(Thu Oct 04 2007 - 23:52:19 CEST)
Re: Book about query processing / query optimization searched
Cimode
(Thu Oct 04 2007 - 23:50:42 CEST)
Re: XML storing and management
djmcmahon_at_gmail.com
(Thu Oct 04 2007 - 23:58:57 CEST)
Re: separation of church and state?
Roy Hann
(Sat Oct 06 2007 - 18:48:33 CEST)
Re: separation of church and state?
David Cressey
(Sat Oct 06 2007 - 18:54:15 CEST)
Re: separation of church and state?
David Cressey
(Sat Oct 06 2007 - 21:05:07 CEST)
Re: separation of church and state?
David Cressey
(Sat Oct 06 2007 - 21:07:38 CEST)
Re: separation of church and state?
David Cressey
(Sat Oct 06 2007 - 21:10:36 CEST)
Re: separation of church and state?
David Portas
(Sat Oct 06 2007 - 21:11:05 CEST)
Re: separation of church and state?
David Cressey
(Sat Oct 06 2007 - 21:19:35 CEST)
Computer Security Information
admiz.kumar.com.use_at_gmail.com
(Thu Oct 11 2007 - 02:37:45 CEST)
Enterprise Data Architecture
Parker
(Thu Oct 11 2007 - 13:18:48 CEST)
Re: Enterprise Data Architecture
Bob Badour
(Thu Oct 11 2007 - 14:14:42 CEST)
Re: Enterprise Data Architecture
Roy Hann
(Thu Oct 11 2007 - 16:43:18 CEST)
Entities and relationships
Tegiri Nenashi
(Fri Oct 12 2007 - 20:35:15 CEST)
Re: Entities and relationships
Bob Badour
(Fri Oct 12 2007 - 21:33:22 CEST)
New to the job
nujcharee_at_googlemail.com
(Sun Oct 14 2007 - 04:17:22 CEST)
Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?
dutone
(Mon Oct 15 2007 - 22:13:31 CEST)
Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?
David Portas
(Mon Oct 15 2007 - 23:00:50 CEST)
Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?
dutone
(Mon Oct 15 2007 - 23:59:06 CEST)
Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?
Cimode
(Mon Oct 15 2007 - 23:03:09 CEST)
Re: Is it Possible to Enforce This Relationship at the DB Level?
dutone
(Mon Oct 15 2007 - 23:54:34 CEST)
Types variables and values
David BL
(Mon Oct 22 2007 - 05:23:02 CEST)
MULTICONF-08 Call for papers
john
(Thu Oct 25 2007 - 01:02:09 CEST)
"Fuzzy" text search using n-grams (bigrams) -- speed?
crazyhorse
(Thu Oct 25 2007 - 01:03:03 CEST)
Re: "Fuzzy" text search using n-grams (bigrams) -- speed?
Bob Badour
(Thu Oct 25 2007 - 01:48:00 CEST)
Re: "Fuzzy" text search using n-grams (bigrams) -- speed?
crazyhorse
(Thu Oct 25 2007 - 06:53:48 CEST)
Re: "Fuzzy" text search using n-grams (bigrams) -- speed?
David Cressey
(Thu Oct 25 2007 - 10:12:10 CEST)
Re: "Fuzzy" text search using n-grams (bigrams) -- speed?
diogomartins
(Thu Oct 25 2007 - 14:05:53 CEST)
Re: "Fuzzy" text search using n-grams (bigrams) -- speed?
crazyhorse
(Thu Oct 25 2007 - 16:53:44 CEST)
Re: "Fuzzy" text search using n-grams (bigrams) -- speed?
Patricia Shanahan
(Thu Oct 25 2007 - 17:06:03 CEST)
Re: Attribute-values in separate table
Authorised User
(Thu Oct 25 2007 - 15:01:54 CEST)
Re: Attribute-values in separate table
Roy Hann
(Thu Oct 25 2007 - 16:30:26 CEST)
Software Testing Resource
jimy.clarke_at_gmail.com
(Fri Oct 26 2007 - 11:51:43 CEST)
Re: Software Testing Resource
Bob Badour
(Fri Oct 26 2007 - 14:34:16 CEST)
RM and abstract syntax trees
David BL
(Tue Oct 30 2007 - 04:06:44 CET)
Re: RM and abstract syntax trees
Roy Hann
(Tue Oct 30 2007 - 10:29:23 CET)
Re: RM and abstract syntax trees
David BL
(Tue Oct 30 2007 - 12:29:32 CET)
Re: RM and abstract syntax trees
Bob Badour
(Tue Oct 30 2007 - 19:22:26 CET)
Re: RM and abstract syntax trees
Bob Badour
(Tue Oct 30 2007 - 19:13:16 CET)
Re: RM and abstract syntax trees
Bob Badour
(Tue Oct 30 2007 - 19:39:26 CET)
Re: RM and abstract syntax trees
Tegiri Nenashi
(Tue Oct 30 2007 - 21:55:33 CET)
One-To-One Relationships
Phil Reynolds
(Tue Oct 30 2007 - 06:53:33 CET)
Re: One-To-One Relationships
Gints Plivna
(Tue Oct 30 2007 - 08:21:28 CET)
Re: One-To-One Relationships
SystemError
(Tue Oct 30 2007 - 10:10:07 CET)
Re: One-To-One Relationships
Roy Hann
(Tue Oct 30 2007 - 10:26:30 CET)
Re: One-To-One Relationships
Bob Badour
(Tue Oct 30 2007 - 13:21:15 CET)
Re: One-To-One Relationships
David Cressey
(Tue Oct 30 2007 - 15:26:44 CET)
Re: One-To-One Relationships
Bob Badour
(Tue Oct 30 2007 - 18:26:20 CET)
Re: One-To-One Relationships
David Cressey
(Tue Oct 30 2007 - 20:57:39 CET)
Circular relationship problem
Arash
(Tue Oct 30 2007 - 22:21:28 CET)
Re: Circular relationship problem
mAsterdam
(Tue Oct 30 2007 - 23:06:15 CET)
Re: atomic
Bob Badour
(Wed Oct 31 2007 - 04:05:59 CET)
Re: atomic
Bob Badour
(Wed Oct 31 2007 - 13:24:32 CET)
Re: atomic
Roy Hann
(Wed Oct 31 2007 - 08:31:25 CET)
Re: atomic
David BL
(Wed Oct 31 2007 - 14:07:20 CET)
Re: atomic
Marshall
(Wed Oct 31 2007 - 19:58:48 CET)
Re: atomic
Bob Badour
(Wed Oct 31 2007 - 20:46:10 CET)
Re: atomic
Marshall
(Wed Oct 31 2007 - 20:57:01 CET)
Re: atomic
Bob Badour
(Wed Oct 31 2007 - 22:44:54 CET)
Re: atomic
Marshall
(Wed Oct 31 2007 - 16:35:05 CET)
Re: atomic
David Cressey
(Wed Oct 31 2007 - 17:35:25 CET)
Last message date
:
Wed Oct 31 2007 - 23:57:39 CET
Archived on
: Sun Jun 26 2016 - 22:29:23 CEST
182 messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
.::
Blogger Home
::
Wiki Home
::
Forum Home
::
Privacy
::
Contact
::.
