Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: separation of church and state?

Re: separation of church and state?

From: David Cressey <cressey73_at_verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2007 19:05:07 GMT
Message-ID: <D%QNi.3957$br2.3260@trndny03>

"Roy Hann" <specially_at_processed.almost.meat> wrote in message news:05udncu7Z7ztIZranZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d_at_pipex.net...
> "paul c" <toledobythesea_at_ooyah.ac> wrote in message
> news:hoONi.6504$_K.2827_at_pd7urf3no...
> > It seems a little doctrinaire to me. I can agree that the "result isn't
a
> > relation" but on the other hand a user could see such a result without
> > knowing that "ORDER BY" was involved and not be faulted for taking it to
> > be a relation.
>
> What user ever would? Users never see relations. They see various kinds
of
> reports (using the word "report" to mean anything users get to see).
>

That depends on what you mean by the word "user". Is the user of a table or a view a "user"? Received on Sat Oct 06 2007 - 14:05:07 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US