Re: RM and abstract syntax trees
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:42:10 -0000
Message-ID: <1193841730.322245.259650_at_v23g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
On Oct 30, 5:59 pm, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Marshall wrote:
> > On Oct 30, 10:39 am, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
> >>I would like to see more heavy thinkers thinking about 6NF.
>
> > You've hinted at this idea before. I make no claims about
> > being a heavy thinker, but I've generally found your ideas
> > to be worth pursuing. Do you have any suggestions for
> > what I should be reading, before I start doing any
> > thinking? :-)
>
> I don't know about reading but a good skim of /Temporal Data and the
> Relational Model/ by Date, Darwen and Lorentzos might get some juices
> flowing. And if I recall correctly Fabian may have had a word or two to
> say in /Practical Issues.../ Frankly, I don't know whether anyone else
> has even looked at 6NF.
>
> 6NF has apparent utility for temporal data,
I gotta read that "Temporal Data" book, dagnabbit. I despair that I am such a slow reader.
> and I think it seems to have
> utility for partially known data.
Ha! We've had that conversation before. And in fact
after an exuberant conversation or two (ahem)
you've convinced me that I need to look at
that more closely.
> seem a little awkward when working with 6NF. The question is: What
> short-hands would facilitate working with 6NF data? What is the
> significance, if any, of those short-hands?
Marshall Received on Wed Oct 31 2007 - 15:42:10 CET