Re: Enterprise Data Architecture

From: Cimode <cimode_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 05:01:36 -0700
Message-ID: <1192190496.669465.307000_at_z24g2000prh.googlegroups.com>


On Oct 12, 12:38 pm, Tony D <tonyisyour..._at_netscape.net> wrote:
> On Oct 12, 9:21 am, Cimode <cim..._at_hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --Critics of Parker's book
> > Parker's book is a true *revolution* in thinking. Parker has
> > developped a *model* which is also a *paradigm shift* in the way we
> > perceive *data* in the database. It does fit more precisely today's
> > systems needs and helps avoid the problem of *impedance mismatch*
> > common on relational databases products such as Oracle, SQL Server and
> > DB2. Parker's model is recognized ISO 9010 and is spoken of by ANSI
> > committee as
> > "The next great thing since the relational model became obsolete....
> > (D.Parek PhD - ANSI Comittee)
>
> > In terms of *methodology* Parker's rules and revolutionnary taxonomy
> > guarantees the *practicality* of the systems and liberating your data assets from remote and uncooperative DBAs to encourage agile development in post-relational environments at the object level modern developers expect
>
> > Reading and Implementing Parker's book's secrets (such as how to truly
> > make your database systems truly XML- compliant and friendly) for a
> > mere 60$ value will change your life and bring success to your
> > company.
>
> > Amen...
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Very good, but only a B+. You didn't say "object", "post-relational"
> or "agile". Your second para could end, (delete from "making sure..."
> onwards) "liberating your data assets from remote and uncooperative
> DBAs to encourage agile development in post-relational environments at
> the object level modern developers expect".
>
> Not that I'm feeling cynical today, not at all.

All right. post-object-relational sounds even better. Received on Fri Oct 12 2007 - 14:01:36 CEST

Original text of this message