Re: atomic
From: Marshall <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:58:48 -0000
Message-ID: <1193857128.980859.155970_at_i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:58:48 -0000
Message-ID: <1193857128.980859.155970_at_i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
On Oct 31, 11:02 am, paul c <toledobythe..._at_ooyah.ac> wrote:
> David BL wrote:
>
> > Can that be formalised? I agree with Bob that in general we have a
> > set of operators and they can allow us to see internal structure.
> > What does it mean for a value to be *treated* as atomic?
>
> I think it means that relational algebra operators are not allowed to
> decompose it.
Nice!!!
Marshall Received on Wed Oct 31 2007 - 19:58:48 CET