Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: RM and abstract syntax trees

Re: RM and abstract syntax trees

From: David BL <davidbl_at_iinet.net.au>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 04:29:32 -0700
Message-ID: <1193743772.498246.198100@e34g2000pro.googlegroups.com>


On Oct 30, 6:29 pm, "Roy Hann" <specia..._at_processed.almost.meat> wrote:
> "David BL" <davi..._at_iinet.net.au> wrote in message
>
> news:1193713604.283167.146850_at_e34g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
>
> > In the following I compare different techniques for representing an
> > Abstract Syntax Tree (AST), concluding that RM is poorly suited.
>
> [snip]
>
> > I anticipate that this rule of thumb provides a useful insight on that
> > rather vague notion of "semi-structured data". ie it explains exactly
> > when and why there is data that is not suitable for direct
> > representation in RM.
>
> Education triumphs over learning once again.
>
> Roy

Please say what you disagree with. I can take it. Received on Tue Oct 30 2007 - 06:29:32 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US