Re: RM and abstract syntax trees
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 04:29:32 -0700
On Oct 30, 6:29 pm, "Roy Hann" <specia..._at_processed.almost.meat>
> "David BL" <davi..._at_iinet.net.au> wrote in message
> > In the following I compare different techniques for representing an
> > Abstract Syntax Tree (AST), concluding that RM is poorly suited.
> > I anticipate that this rule of thumb provides a useful insight on that
> > rather vague notion of "semi-structured data". ie it explains exactly
> > when and why there is data that is not suitable for direct
> > representation in RM.
> Education triumphs over learning once again.
Please say what you disagree with. I can take it. Received on Tue Oct 30 2007 - 12:29:32 CET