Re: separation of church and state?
From: Roy Hann <specially_at_processed.almost.meat>
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 13:05:56 +0100
Message-ID: <9fednfazBq0zVpXanZ2dnUVZ8s-qnZ2d_at_pipex.net>
>> "paul c" <toledobythe..._at_ooyah.ac> wrote in message
>>
>> news:hoONi.6504$_K.2827_at_pd7urf3no...
>>
>> > It seems a little doctrinaire to me. I can agree that the "result
>> > isn't a
>> > relation" but on the other hand a user could see such a result without
>> > knowing that "ORDER BY" was involved and not be faulted for taking it
>> > to
>> > be a relation.
>>
>> What user ever would? Users never see relations. They see various kinds
>> of
>> reports (using the word "report" to mean anything users get to see).
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 13:05:56 +0100
Message-ID: <9fednfazBq0zVpXanZ2dnUVZ8s-qnZ2d_at_pipex.net>
"Marshall" <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com> wrote in message news:1191742694.188301.91520_at_k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 6, 9:48 am, "Roy Hann" <specia..._at_processed.almost.meat> wrote:
>> "paul c" <toledobythe..._at_ooyah.ac> wrote in message
>>
>> news:hoONi.6504$_K.2827_at_pd7urf3no...
>>
>> > It seems a little doctrinaire to me. I can agree that the "result
>> > isn't a
>> > relation" but on the other hand a user could see such a result without
>> > knowing that "ORDER BY" was involved and not be faulted for taking it
>> > to
>> > be a relation.
>>
>> What user ever would? Users never see relations. They see various kinds
>> of
>> reports (using the word "report" to mean anything users get to see).
> All that goofy stuff I wrote above can be argued for, but why?
That was pretty much my point: Paul was thinking about possibly true facts
but in an irrelevant framework.
Roy