Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: RM and abstract syntax trees

Re: RM and abstract syntax trees

From: Tegiri Nenashi <TegiriNenashi_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:55:33 -0700
Message-ID: <1193777733.477443.158780@z24g2000prh.googlegroups.com> 





On Oct 29, 7:06 pm, David BL <davi..._at_iinet.net.au> wrote:


> In the following I compare different techniques for representing an

> Abstract Syntax Tree (AST), concluding that RM is poorly suited.




The connection between parsing and logic has been explored in
Pereira&Warren works, e.g.


http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/576360.html
Received on Tue Oct 30 2007 - 15:55:33 CDT












Original text of this message













  HOME |
  ASK QUESTION |
  ADD INFO |
  SEARCH |
  E-MAIL US