Re: RM and abstract syntax trees
From: Tegiri Nenashi <TegiriNenashi_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:55:33 -0700
Message-ID: <1193777733.477443.158780_at_z24g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:55:33 -0700
Message-ID: <1193777733.477443.158780_at_z24g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
On Oct 29, 7:06 pm, David BL <davi..._at_iinet.net.au> wrote:
> In the following I compare different techniques for representing an
> Abstract Syntax Tree (AST), concluding that RM is poorly suited.
The connection between parsing and logic has been explored in
Pereira&Warren works, e.g.
http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/576360.html
Received on Tue Oct 30 2007 - 21:55:33 CET