Home
->
Usenet
->
comp.databases.theory
-> by thread
comp.databases.theory: by thread
250 messages
:
Starting
Mon May 03 2010 - 14:23:43 CEST,
Ending
Mon May 31 2010 - 12:28:32 CEST
This period
:
Most recent messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
CIAC 2010 - Call for Participation: 7th International Conference on Algorithms and Complexity
Emanuele Fusco
(Mon May 03 2010 - 14:23:43 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Bob Badour
(Tue May 04 2010 - 00:42:54 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
paul c
(Tue May 04 2010 - 03:04:26 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Nilone
(Tue May 04 2010 - 10:49:55 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Tegiri Nenashi
(Tue May 04 2010 - 22:13:50 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Bob Badour
(Wed May 05 2010 - 04:34:18 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
David BL
(Wed May 05 2010 - 07:09:14 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Bob Badour
(Wed May 05 2010 - 08:49:54 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
David BL
(Wed May 05 2010 - 07:19:02 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
David BL
(Wed May 05 2010 - 11:47:35 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Bob Badour
(Wed May 05 2010 - 11:52:25 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
David BL
(Wed May 05 2010 - 15:35:52 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Erwin
(Wed May 05 2010 - 21:41:58 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Tegiri Nenashi
(Wed May 05 2010 - 22:56:35 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Mr. Scott
(Thu May 06 2010 - 09:00:32 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Bob Badour
(Thu May 06 2010 - 15:10:32 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Erwin
(Thu May 06 2010 - 11:39:05 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
paul c
(Thu May 06 2010 - 17:32:17 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Erwin
(Thu May 06 2010 - 11:47:59 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Erwin
(Thu May 06 2010 - 12:09:04 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Mr. Scott
(Thu May 06 2010 - 14:14:05 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Erwin
(Thu May 06 2010 - 14:51:09 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Erwin
(Thu May 06 2010 - 16:48:39 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Mr. Scott
(Thu May 06 2010 - 21:35:27 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Mr. Scott
(Thu May 06 2010 - 22:02:28 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Tegiri Nenashi
(Thu May 06 2010 - 22:02:44 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Tegiri Nenashi
(Thu May 06 2010 - 22:14:31 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Tegiri Nenashi
(Fri May 07 2010 - 00:12:58 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Reinier Post
(Fri May 07 2010 - 01:09:04 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Bob Badour
(Fri May 07 2010 - 03:11:29 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Erwin
(Fri May 07 2010 - 01:12:57 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Erwin
(Fri May 07 2010 - 01:13:37 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
David BL
(Fri May 07 2010 - 01:13:52 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Bob Badour
(Fri May 07 2010 - 03:20:24 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Bob Badour
(Fri May 07 2010 - 03:23:49 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Reinier Post
(Fri May 07 2010 - 01:14:33 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Erwin
(Fri May 07 2010 - 01:18:28 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Erwin
(Fri May 07 2010 - 01:34:10 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Reinier Post
(Fri May 07 2010 - 01:38:53 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Erwin
(Fri May 07 2010 - 01:51:46 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
paul c
(Fri May 07 2010 - 19:55:09 CEST)
Re: Declaring super types
David BL
(Fri May 07 2010 - 01:51:47 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
David BL
(Fri May 07 2010 - 03:34:48 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Bob Badour
(Fri May 07 2010 - 04:37:40 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Mr. Scott
(Fri May 07 2010 - 05:43:42 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Mr. Scott
(Fri May 07 2010 - 06:02:01 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
David BL
(Fri May 07 2010 - 07:06:56 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Bob Badour
(Fri May 07 2010 - 15:36:42 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Nilone
(Fri May 07 2010 - 09:00:45 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Erwin
(Fri May 07 2010 - 13:14:52 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Mr. Scott
(Fri May 07 2010 - 13:43:30 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Erwin
(Sat May 08 2010 - 00:03:44 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
paul c
(Tue May 11 2010 - 19:02:30 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Tegiri Nenashi
(Sat May 08 2010 - 01:00:01 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
David BL
(Sat May 08 2010 - 07:11:21 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Bob Badour
(Sat May 08 2010 - 19:09:49 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Erwin
(Sat May 08 2010 - 11:51:33 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Bob Badour
(Sat May 08 2010 - 19:10:49 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Reinier Post
(Sat May 08 2010 - 14:12:00 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Reinier Post
(Sat May 08 2010 - 14:42:57 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Mr. Scott
(Sat May 08 2010 - 15:58:09 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Bob Badour
(Sat May 08 2010 - 19:14:33 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Mr. Scott
(Sat May 08 2010 - 19:47:46 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Bob Badour
(Sat May 08 2010 - 20:42:37 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Nilone
(Sat May 08 2010 - 20:14:18 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Bob Badour
(Sat May 08 2010 - 20:44:19 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Nilone
(Sat May 08 2010 - 20:34:49 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Nilone
(Sat May 08 2010 - 21:04:44 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Bob Badour
(Sat May 08 2010 - 22:16:37 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Mr. Scott
(Sun May 09 2010 - 00:54:03 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
paul c
(Sun May 09 2010 - 02:33:17 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Bob Badour
(Sun May 09 2010 - 04:00:14 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
David BL
(Sun May 09 2010 - 03:44:37 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Mr. Scott
(Sun May 09 2010 - 04:13:30 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
David BL
(Sun May 09 2010 - 04:13:59 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Bob Badour
(Sun May 09 2010 - 05:38:24 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
David BL
(Sun May 09 2010 - 04:46:50 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Mr. Scott
(Sun May 09 2010 - 05:36:40 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Nilone
(Sun May 09 2010 - 10:05:20 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
David BL
(Sun May 09 2010 - 14:54:25 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
David BL
(Sun May 09 2010 - 15:29:12 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
paul c
(Sun May 09 2010 - 18:07:49 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Cimode
(Sun May 09 2010 - 23:24:58 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
David BL
(Mon May 10 2010 - 05:24:39 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Keith H Duggar
(Mon May 10 2010 - 07:34:00 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Keith H Duggar
(Mon May 10 2010 - 08:06:06 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Nilone
(Mon May 10 2010 - 11:21:08 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
David BL
(Mon May 10 2010 - 11:54:06 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
David BL
(Mon May 10 2010 - 12:24:25 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Nilone
(Mon May 10 2010 - 13:14:12 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
David BL
(Tue May 11 2010 - 01:29:53 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
David BL
(Tue May 11 2010 - 04:04:43 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
David BL
(Tue May 11 2010 - 04:25:32 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Keith H Duggar
(Tue May 11 2010 - 05:00:27 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
David BL
(Tue May 11 2010 - 12:02:35 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Keith H Duggar
(Tue May 11 2010 - 16:27:28 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Erwin
(Wed May 12 2010 - 00:15:15 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Bob Badour
(Wed May 12 2010 - 01:44:47 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
paul c
(Wed May 12 2010 - 05:44:27 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Bob Badour
(Wed May 12 2010 - 06:03:22 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Bob Badour
(Wed May 12 2010 - 06:04:54 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
paul c
(Wed May 12 2010 - 07:12:29 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Bob Badour
(Wed May 12 2010 - 15:51:41 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Tegiri Nenashi
(Wed May 12 2010 - 00:30:34 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Bob Badour
(Wed May 12 2010 - 01:46:37 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Tegiri Nenashi
(Wed May 12 2010 - 02:10:37 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Bob Badour
(Wed May 12 2010 - 02:12:43 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Erwin
(Wed May 12 2010 - 02:19:07 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Erwin
(Wed May 12 2010 - 02:30:39 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Bob Badour
(Wed May 12 2010 - 02:39:13 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Erwin
(Wed May 12 2010 - 02:34:07 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Gene Wirchenko
(Wed May 12 2010 - 04:22:17 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Gene Wirchenko
(Wed May 12 2010 - 04:26:50 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Bob Badour
(Wed May 12 2010 - 06:01:30 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Tegiri Nenashi
(Wed May 12 2010 - 06:14:52 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
David BL
(Wed May 12 2010 - 07:53:56 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
David BL
(Wed May 12 2010 - 08:48:31 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Nilone
(Wed May 12 2010 - 09:53:23 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Erwin
(Wed May 12 2010 - 13:31:36 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Erwin
(Wed May 12 2010 - 14:18:29 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Tegiri Nenashi
(Wed May 12 2010 - 18:12:06 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Tegiri Nenashi
(Wed May 12 2010 - 18:26:24 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Erwin
(Wed May 12 2010 - 20:54:35 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Tegiri Nenashi
(Wed May 12 2010 - 23:36:29 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Nilone
(Thu May 13 2010 - 10:07:25 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Nilone
(Thu May 13 2010 - 16:33:24 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Tegiri Nenashi
(Thu May 13 2010 - 17:35:11 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Nilone
(Fri May 14 2010 - 09:57:59 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Nilone
(Mon May 17 2010 - 20:53:09 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
David BL
(Tue May 18 2010 - 04:57:53 CEST)
Re: General semantics
paul c
(Tue May 18 2010 - 19:59:11 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Daniel Pitts
(Tue May 18 2010 - 22:40:14 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Erwin
(Tue May 18 2010 - 23:19:52 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Nilone
(Wed May 19 2010 - 10:43:35 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Bob Badour
(Wed May 19 2010 - 16:12:16 CEST)
Re: General semantics
paul c
(Wed May 19 2010 - 17:12:42 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Bob Badour
(Wed May 19 2010 - 17:15:54 CEST)
Re: General semantics
paul c
(Thu May 20 2010 - 02:41:06 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Clifford Heath
(Thu May 20 2010 - 10:15:04 CEST)
Re: General semantics
paul c
(Fri May 21 2010 - 02:58:57 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Clifford Heath
(Fri May 21 2010 - 07:57:56 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Cimode
(Wed May 19 2010 - 14:37:32 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Cimode
(Wed May 19 2010 - 18:08:27 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Nilone
(Wed May 19 2010 - 20:02:46 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Nilone
(Wed May 19 2010 - 20:10:47 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Bob Badour
(Wed May 19 2010 - 21:41:49 CEST)
Re: General semantics
paul c
(Thu May 20 2010 - 02:22:05 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Nilone
(Wed May 19 2010 - 22:26:42 CEST)
Re: General semantics
paul c
(Thu May 20 2010 - 01:56:07 CEST)
Re: General semantics
paul c
(Thu May 20 2010 - 04:59:43 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Tegiri Nenashi
(Thu May 20 2010 - 00:08:57 CEST)
Re: General semantics
paul c
(Thu May 20 2010 - 01:58:22 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Tegiri Nenashi
(Thu May 20 2010 - 03:46:06 CEST)
Re: General semantics
paul c
(Thu May 20 2010 - 03:58:02 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Tegiri Nenashi
(Thu May 20 2010 - 03:54:45 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Nilone
(Thu May 20 2010 - 12:27:09 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Gene Wirchenko
(Thu May 20 2010 - 19:24:15 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Erwin
(Thu May 20 2010 - 22:51:57 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Tegiri Nenashi
(Thu May 20 2010 - 22:52:24 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Erwin
(Thu May 20 2010 - 23:31:05 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Gene Wirchenko
(Thu May 20 2010 - 23:31:31 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Bob Badour
(Thu May 20 2010 - 23:38:43 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Erwin
(Fri May 21 2010 - 12:16:42 CEST)
Re: General semantics
paul c
(Fri May 21 2010 - 16:59:40 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Nilone
(Fri May 21 2010 - 12:41:27 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Bob Badour
(Fri May 21 2010 - 16:20:45 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Nilone
(Fri May 21 2010 - 12:45:06 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Erwin
(Fri May 21 2010 - 13:38:26 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Cimode
(Fri May 21 2010 - 14:15:45 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Clifford Heath
(Fri May 21 2010 - 17:44:48 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Nilone
(Fri May 21 2010 - 14:35:28 CEST)
Re: General semantics
paul c
(Fri May 21 2010 - 17:02:05 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Clifford Heath
(Fri May 21 2010 - 17:58:49 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Erwin
(Fri May 21 2010 - 15:12:18 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Nilone
(Fri May 21 2010 - 19:27:26 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Bob Badour
(Fri May 21 2010 - 19:42:13 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Nilone
(Fri May 21 2010 - 19:29:15 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Clifford Heath
(Sat May 22 2010 - 12:44:46 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Nilone
(Fri May 21 2010 - 19:42:28 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Erwin
(Fri May 21 2010 - 20:26:29 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Clifford Heath
(Sat May 22 2010 - 03:13:29 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Cimode
(Fri May 21 2010 - 20:34:55 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Bob Badour
(Fri May 21 2010 - 22:02:44 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Cimode
(Fri May 21 2010 - 20:40:24 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Cimode
(Fri May 21 2010 - 20:41:59 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Nilone
(Fri May 21 2010 - 21:28:59 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Bob Badour
(Fri May 21 2010 - 22:06:45 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Clifford Heath
(Sat May 22 2010 - 12:44:34 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Nilone
(Fri May 21 2010 - 21:53:56 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Erwin
(Fri May 21 2010 - 22:35:17 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Cimode
(Fri May 21 2010 - 22:59:11 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Bob Badour
(Fri May 21 2010 - 23:23:16 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Cimode
(Fri May 21 2010 - 23:51:42 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Erwin
(Fri May 21 2010 - 23:52:43 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Nilone
(Sat May 22 2010 - 00:20:41 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Reinier Post
(Sat May 22 2010 - 00:26:31 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Erwin
(Sat May 22 2010 - 01:15:16 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Mr. Scott
(Sat May 22 2010 - 03:43:54 CEST)
Re: General semantics
paul c
(Sun May 23 2010 - 19:15:36 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Erwin
(Sat May 22 2010 - 12:09:10 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Clifford Heath
(Sat May 22 2010 - 13:31:56 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Nilone
(Sat May 22 2010 - 12:41:15 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Nilone
(Sat May 22 2010 - 13:44:30 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Nilone
(Sat May 22 2010 - 14:35:36 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Nilone
(Sat May 22 2010 - 14:51:33 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Erwin
(Sat May 22 2010 - 15:33:34 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Mr. Scott
(Sat May 22 2010 - 18:09:54 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Clifford Heath
(Sun May 23 2010 - 00:33:03 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Reinier Post
(Sat May 22 2010 - 21:14:44 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Keith H Duggar
(Sat May 22 2010 - 21:53:46 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Reinier Post
(Sat May 22 2010 - 21:53:07 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Erwin
(Sat May 22 2010 - 23:15:20 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Erwin
(Sun May 23 2010 - 01:00:28 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Erwin
(Sun May 23 2010 - 01:20:20 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Mr. Scott
(Sun May 23 2010 - 04:57:45 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
David BL
(Sun May 23 2010 - 23:10:21 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Erwin
(Mon May 24 2010 - 01:21:04 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Nilone
(Mon May 24 2010 - 14:23:58 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Reinier Post
(Mon May 24 2010 - 15:13:12 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Reinier Post
(Mon May 24 2010 - 16:03:40 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Reinier Post
(Mon May 24 2010 - 16:11:19 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Tegiri Nenashi
(Mon May 24 2010 - 18:33:09 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Mr. Scott
(Tue May 25 2010 - 23:04:54 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Erwin
(Wed May 26 2010 - 00:57:15 CEST)
Re: General semantics
paul c
(Wed May 26 2010 - 02:14:27 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Mr. Scott
(Wed May 26 2010 - 03:46:07 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Erwin
(Wed May 26 2010 - 11:23:45 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Erwin
(Wed May 26 2010 - 11:38:40 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Mr. Scott
(Wed May 26 2010 - 16:05:49 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Reinier Post
(Thu May 27 2010 - 01:15:10 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Reinier Post
(Thu May 27 2010 - 01:44:46 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Erwin
(Thu May 27 2010 - 11:16:25 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Bob Badour
(Thu May 27 2010 - 17:53:17 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Mr. Scott
(Thu May 27 2010 - 22:00:11 CEST)
Re: On formal HAS-A definition
Nilone
(Fri May 28 2010 - 15:20:11 CEST)
Re: On Formal IS-A definition
Reinier Post
(Mon May 03 2010 - 23:49:29 CEST)
On formal HAS-A definition
Tegiri Nenashi
(Tue May 04 2010 - 23:21:49 CEST)
Another announcement of the next generation DBMS ...
Erwin
(Wed May 05 2010 - 22:28:52 CEST)
CFP International Conference WWW/Internet 2010: submissions until 28 May 2010
natty2006_at_gmail.com
(Thu May 06 2010 - 16:28:56 CEST)
CFP Applied Computing 2010: submissions until 28 May 2010
natty2006_at_gmail.com
(Thu May 06 2010 - 16:29:30 CEST)
DATA MINING 2010: 1st call extension – until 24 May 2010
natty2006_at_gmail.com
(Thu May 06 2010 - 16:31:28 CEST)
Re: Declaring super types
Erwin
(Thu May 06 2010 - 19:28:51 CEST)
General semantics
Nilone
(Tue May 11 2010 - 07:50:48 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Cimode
(Tue May 11 2010 - 14:20:19 CEST)
Re: General semantics
Nilone
(Tue May 11 2010 - 17:27:06 CEST)
Call for papers: EISWT-10, USA, July 2010
James Heralds
(Sun May 16 2010 - 04:27:46 CEST)
----- WAREZ 4 SALE ----- 59319
david007_at_worldnewstonight.net
(Tue May 25 2010 - 02:17:14 CEST)
The original version
vldm10
(Wed May 26 2010 - 22:59:34 CEST)
Re: The original version
vldm10
(Mon May 31 2010 - 12:28:32 CEST)
IUA Conference Agenda
Roy Hann
(Fri May 28 2010 - 10:08:46 CEST)
Last message date
:
Mon May 31 2010 - 12:28:32 CEST
Archived on
: Sun Jun 05 2016 - 05:21:19 CEST
250 messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
.::
Blogger Home
::
Wiki Home
::
Forum Home
::
Privacy
::
Contact
::.