Re: On Formal IS-A definition
From: Gene Wirchenko <genew_at_ocis.net>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 19:22:17 -0700
Message-ID: <h44ku5hm1u6smoihg04m415vglnk9ner4l_at_4ax.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 19:22:17 -0700
Message-ID: <h44ku5hm1u6smoihg04m415vglnk9ner4l_at_4ax.com>
On Tue, 11 May 2010 03:02:35 -0700 (PDT), David BL <davidbl_at_iinet.net.au> wrote:
[snip]
>never change. Given that your notion of variable doesn't match mine
>at all, I have no doubt that we each will be invoking the Principle of
>Incoherence.
Well, I certainly am invoking it. Welcome to my killfile.
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko Received on Wed May 12 2010 - 04:22:17 CEST