Re: General semantics

From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 17:02:44 -0300
Message-ID: <4bf6e61b$0$11838$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>



Cimode wrote:

> On 21 mai, 17:44, Clifford Heath <n..._at_spam.please.net> wrote:
>

>>Cimode wrote:
>>
>>>Having tried for more than 30 years to discard RM, OO crowd is now
>>>reinventing (attempting to) RM.
>>
>>Maybe. But the "objects" of object role modeling have nothing to do
>>with the object of the O-O crowd. The word object in ORM was derived
>>from linguistics, and in use before the term O-O was invented.

>
> Object-oriented programming is an exceptionally bad idea which could
> only have originated in California.
> Edsger Dijkstra

Cimode, you are just making a fool of yourself, again. ORM has nothing to do with the OO crowd. It is a graphical representation of NIAM.

See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G.M._Nijssen Received on Fri May 21 2010 - 15:02:44 CDT

Original text of this message