Re: General semantics
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 11:20:45 -0300
Message-ID: <4bf695f3$0$11817$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 11:20:45 -0300
Message-ID: <4bf695f3$0$11817$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
Nilone wrote:
> On May 20, 10:51 pm, Erwin <e.sm..._at_myonline.be> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the feedback. Let's see if I can explain and defend that
> argument.
>
>>You seem to axiomatically assume that OIDs are a necessity, and that
>>they _must_ exist.
>
> Not at all. However, OOP languages are built on OIDs / references /
> pointers. Any relational description of OOP must include them.
Hell no! Received on Fri May 21 2010 - 16:20:45 CEST