Re: General semantics

From: Cimode <cimode_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 13:59:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <50523f75-aa22-41df-a3c3-9d5b27823460_at_z33g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>



Snipped
> Cimode, you are just making a fool of yourself, again. ORM has nothing
> to do with the OO crowd. It is a graphical representation of NIAM.
You are correct.

Thanks for pointing out my misjudgment on this. Lately, I tend to have epidermic reactions to anything that mentions *Object* as a part of database theory since I face OO crowd on a daily basis telling me about mapping relations into classes: it gets frustrating. The initial content of the posts in this thread comforted me in my mistake.

Does ORM really worth the effort of reading ? What does it add that is not already a part of RM?
> See:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G.M._Nijssen
Received on Fri May 21 2010 - 15:59:11 CDT

Original text of this message