Re: On formal HAS-A definition
From: Nilone <reaanb_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 May 2010 12:04:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53ede294-67cc-4fc2-88bf-0e3f620a025c_at_t34g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
Date: Sat, 8 May 2010 12:04:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53ede294-67cc-4fc2-88bf-0e3f620a025c_at_t34g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
On May 8, 8:44 pm, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
> This is where Clinton becomes vitally important.
I'm pleased to see a direct reply from you, Bob. Does that mean I'm not killfiled anymore? I was hoping that one day my vociferous ignorance and flippant attitude could be forgiven if I studied hard. :) Received on Sat May 08 2010 - 21:04:44 CEST