Re: General semantics
From: Tegiri Nenashi <tegirinenashi_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 09:33:09 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <471a42ba-fc86-4d2f-b47c-22634f827fcb_at_y6g2000pra.googlegroups.com>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 09:33:09 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <471a42ba-fc86-4d2f-b47c-22634f827fcb_at_y6g2000pra.googlegroups.com>
On May 22, 3:09 am, Erwin <e.sm..._at_myonline.be> wrote:
> All database constraints can be formulated in natural language in the
> form "there cannot be any x(,y,z) such that ..."
Algebraically all database constraints can be represented in either of the three equivalent forms:
- As relational identity.
- As order constraint (generalized subset relation).
- As comparison with DUM.
Proof is the following RL equivalences:
- representing order via equality x < y <-> x ^ y = x.
- verse verso x = y <-> x < y & y < x.
- order via comparison with DUM x < y <-> R00 = ((y' ^ x)` ^ x)`.
- comparison with DUM is trivially an equality constraint
show that every order. Received on Mon May 24 2010 - 18:33:09 CEST