Re: General semantics
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 01:58:02 GMT
Message-ID: <KG0Jn.4252$Z6.3890_at_edtnps82>
>
> I assume by "operators" you mean something other than relational
> algebra operations. Something like arithmetic plus. ...
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 01:58:02 GMT
Message-ID: <KG0Jn.4252$Z6.3890_at_edtnps82>
Tegiri Nenashi wrote:
> On May 19, 4:58 pm, paul c <toledobythe..._at_oohay.ac> wrote:
>> Tegiri Nenashi wrote: >>> ... >>> "relations aren't domains" sounds like some dogma. In my system >>> domains are unary relations (or predicates if the term "relation" is >>> reserved for finite sets of tuples). >> In that case, unary relations have more operators than other relations, >> not a complication I'd like to deal with.
>
> I assume by "operators" you mean something other than relational
> algebra operations. Something like arithmetic plus. ...
I had aggregates in mind. I can think of two uses for plus, one involving relations per se and the other involving attributes. But 'sum' is something else. I'd say it deals with a set that is not a relation. Received on Thu May 20 2010 - 03:58:02 CEST