Re: Declaring super types

From: Erwin <e.smout_at_myonline.be>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 10:28:51 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <46d17737-b35d-4d62-a972-5707c65dc802_at_i9g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>

On 20 apr, 04:13, David BL <davi..._at_iinet.net.au> wrote:

> So they can
> *explain* what implicit coercions should be allowed and what aren't.

My understanding was that they opposed to coercions alltogether. Received on Thu May 06 2010 - 19:28:51 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Mr. Scott: "Re: On Formal IS-A definition"
Previous message: paul c: "Re: On Formal IS-A definition"
Next in thread: David BL: "Re: Declaring super types"
Reply: David BL: "Re: Declaring super types"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message