Re: On Formal IS-A definition
From: Reinier Post <rp_at_raampje.lan>
Date: 06 May 2010 23:09:04 GMT
Message-ID: <4be34c10$0$14133$703f8584_at_textnews.kpn.nl>
Date: 06 May 2010 23:09:04 GMT
Message-ID: <4be34c10$0$14133$703f8584_at_textnews.kpn.nl>
>Bob Badour wrote:
>> Reinier Post wrote:
[something about a definition of is-a]
>> I thought Clinton settled this whole issue already. Cigar anyone?
>
>I think Clinton knew his silly language parsing didn't matter to the
>majority of his (semi-literate) public. What puzzles me is why smart
>people here spend time on such subjective fooferah and never bring up,
>say, just what the Information Principle really means.
-- ReinierReceived on Fri May 07 2010 - 01:09:04 CEST