Re: On Formal IS-A definition

From: Erwin <e.smout_at_myonline.be>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 16:34:10 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <f55b92ef-6095-4514-9819-dc2291a85cc3_at_q30g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>

On 7 mei, 01:18, Erwin <e.sm..._at_myonline.be> wrote:
> weard

"weird", of course. Received on Fri May 07 2010 - 01:34:10 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Reinier Post: "Re: On formal HAS-A definition"
Previous message: Erwin: "Re: On Formal IS-A definition"
Maybe in reply to: Reinier Post: "Re: On Formal IS-A definition"
Next in thread: Reinier Post: "Re: On formal HAS-A definition"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message