comp.databases.theory: by thread

Re: Can relational alegbra perform bulk operations? Banana (Thu Oct 01 2009 - 00:49:35 CEST)
- Re: Can relational alegbra perform bulk operations? paul c (Thu Oct 01 2009 - 03:04:54 CEST)
Re: Can relational alegbra perform bulk operations? Clifford Heath (Thu Oct 01 2009 - 03:01:59 CEST)
- Re: Can relational alegbra perform bulk operations? Banana (Thu Oct 01 2009 - 06:21:20 CEST)
Re: Can relational alegbra perform bulk operations? David BL (Thu Oct 01 2009 - 04:37:06 CEST)
Re: Can relational alegbra perform bulk operations? Marshall (Thu Oct 01 2009 - 05:25:01 CEST)
Re: hamsterdb Transactional Storage (thanks to all of you) compdb_at_hotmail.com (Thu Oct 01 2009 - 06:08:16 CEST)
Re: Can relational alegbra perform bulk operations? David BL (Thu Oct 01 2009 - 06:17:21 CEST)
Re: hamsterdb Transactional Storage (thanks to all of you) Clifford Heath (Thu Oct 01 2009 - 11:47:15 CEST)
- Re: Can relational alegbra perform bulk operations? David BL (Fri Oct 02 2009 - 02:28:22 CEST)
- Re: Oracle: why should one specify the width of a number column? VTR250 (Mon Oct 05 2009 - 00:10:46 CEST)
- Re: hamsterdb Transactional Storage (thanks to all of you) rpost (Mon Oct 05 2009 - 19:56:49 CEST)
- Re: In defence of the fat database Nilone (Tue Oct 06 2009 - 15:44:59 CEST)
- Re: In defence of the fat database laurip (Tue Oct 06 2009 - 17:39:00 CEST)
- Re: In defence of the fat database Nilone (Tue Oct 06 2009 - 18:04:51 CEST)
- Re: In defence of the fat database TroyK (Wed Oct 07 2009 - 05:50:01 CEST)
- Re: In defence of the fat database Nilone (Wed Oct 07 2009 - 09:50:35 CEST)
- Re: In defence of the fat database laurip (Wed Oct 07 2009 - 10:35:10 CEST)
- Re: In defence of the fat database Roy Hann (Wed Oct 07 2009 - 12:25:21 CEST)
- Re: In defence of the fat database Nilone (Wed Oct 07 2009 - 14:26:50 CEST)
- Re: In defence of the fat database Nilone (Wed Oct 07 2009 - 14:48:08 CEST)
- Re: In defence of the fat database laurip (Wed Oct 07 2009 - 15:26:29 CEST)
- Re: In defence of the fat database laurip (Wed Oct 07 2009 - 15:34:09 CEST)
- Re: hamsterdb Transactional Storage (thanks to all of you) compdb_at_hotmail.com (Thu Oct 08 2009 - 00:59:01 CEST)
  - Re: hamsterdb Transactional Storage (thanks to all of you) Bob Badour (Thu Oct 08 2009 - 01:26:32 CEST)
    - Re: hamsterdb Transactional Storage (thanks to all of you) paul c (Tue Oct 13 2009 - 16:25:09 CEST)
      - Re: hamsterdb Transactional Storage (thanks to all of you) Bob Badour (Tue Oct 13 2009 - 17:26:06 CEST)
        
        Re: hamsterdb Transactional Storage (thanks to all of you) paul c (Tue Oct 13 2009 - 17:57:03 CEST)
        
        Re: hamsterdb Transactional Storage (thanks to all of you) Bob Badour (Tue Oct 13 2009 - 18:48:52 CEST)
        
        Re: hamsterdb Transactional Storage (thanks to all of you) paul c (Tue Oct 13 2009 - 19:17:50 CEST)
        
        Re: hamsterdb Transactional Storage (thanks to all of you) Bob Badour (Tue Oct 13 2009 - 19:19:42 CEST)
        
        Re: hamsterdb Transactional Storage (thanks to all of you) paul c (Tue Oct 13 2009 - 20:29:22 CEST)
        
        Re: hamsterdb Transactional Storage (thanks to all of you) Bob Badour (Wed Oct 14 2009 - 04:23:24 CEST)
        
        Re: hamsterdb Transactional Storage (thanks to all of you) paul c (Wed Oct 14 2009 - 04:33:34 CEST)
        
        Re: hamsterdb Transactional Storage (thanks to all of you) Bob Badour (Wed Oct 14 2009 - 04:58:26 CEST)
- Re: Oracle: why should one specify the width of a number column? astaroth (Fri Oct 09 2009 - 21:26:03 CEST)
- Re: In defence of the fat database Cimode (Sun Oct 11 2009 - 19:46:52 CEST)
- Re: Oracle: why should one specify the width of a number column? VTR250 (Mon Oct 12 2009 - 23:41:06 CEST)
- Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? paul c (Thu Oct 15 2009 - 03:29:08 CEST)
  - Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? Bob Badour (Thu Oct 15 2009 - 04:07:11 CEST)
    - Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? paul c (Thu Oct 15 2009 - 04:31:46 CEST)
      - Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? Bob Badour (Thu Oct 15 2009 - 04:44:15 CEST)
- Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? Roy Hann (Thu Oct 15 2009 - 15:39:26 CEST)
  - Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? paul c (Thu Oct 15 2009 - 17:16:14 CEST)
    - Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? Bob Badour (Thu Oct 15 2009 - 17:37:51 CEST)
      - Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? paul c (Thu Oct 15 2009 - 18:17:22 CEST)
        
        Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? Bob Badour (Thu Oct 15 2009 - 20:22:55 CEST)
        
        Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? paul c (Thu Oct 15 2009 - 23:09:20 CEST)
        
        Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? paul c (Fri Oct 16 2009 - 01:55:50 CEST)
        
        Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? paul c (Fri Oct 16 2009 - 02:00:17 CEST)
        
        Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? Bob Badour (Fri Oct 16 2009 - 02:14:19 CEST)
        
        Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? paul c (Fri Oct 16 2009 - 03:18:15 CEST)
        Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? Bob Badour (Fri Oct 16 2009 - 03:43:15 CEST)
        
        Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? paul c (Fri Oct 16 2009 - 04:00:02 CEST)
        
        Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? paul c (Fri Oct 16 2009 - 05:59:49 CEST)
- Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? Keith H Duggar (Thu Oct 15 2009 - 18:02:27 CEST)
  - Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? Bob Badour (Thu Oct 15 2009 - 18:06:47 CEST)
  - Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? paul c (Fri Oct 16 2009 - 00:15:47 CEST)
    - Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? paul c (Fri Oct 16 2009 - 01:13:54 CEST)
      - Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? Clifford Heath (Fri Oct 16 2009 - 03:20:06 CEST)
        
        Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? paul c (Fri Oct 16 2009 - 03:27:54 CEST)
        
        Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? paul c (Fri Oct 16 2009 - 03:34:18 CEST)
        
        Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? Bob Badour (Fri Oct 16 2009 - 04:41:22 CEST)
        
        Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? paul c (Fri Oct 16 2009 - 05:17:39 CEST)
        
        Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? paul c (Fri Oct 16 2009 - 03:55:47 CEST)
        
        Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? paul c (Fri Oct 16 2009 - 04:43:07 CEST)
- Re: hamsterdb Transactional Storage (thanks to all of you) compdb_at_hotmail.com (Fri Oct 16 2009 - 02:26:17 CEST)
  - Re: hamsterdb Transactional Storage (thanks to all of you) paul c (Fri Oct 16 2009 - 03:22:58 CEST)
- Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? Gene Wirchenko (Sat Oct 17 2009 - 01:25:34 CEST)
  - Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? Bob Badour (Sat Oct 17 2009 - 03:39:56 CEST)
- Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? Gene Wirchenko (Sun Oct 18 2009 - 05:41:28 CEST)
  - Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? Bob Badour (Sun Oct 18 2009 - 05:43:18 CEST)
- Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? Philipp Post (Mon Oct 19 2009 - 12:09:48 CEST)
- Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? Roy Hann (Mon Oct 19 2009 - 13:13:53 CEST)
- Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? Philipp Post (Mon Oct 19 2009 - 17:17:08 CEST)
- Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? Cimode (Mon Oct 19 2009 - 20:22:16 CEST)
- Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? Roy Hann (Mon Oct 19 2009 - 20:59:31 CEST)
- Re: two nasty schemata, union types and surrogate keys rpost (Mon Oct 19 2009 - 21:00:43 CEST)
- Re: two nasty schemata, union types and surrogate keys Brian (Tue Oct 20 2009 - 01:30:08 CEST)
- Re: two nasty schemata, union types and surrogate keys David BL (Tue Oct 20 2009 - 04:19:24 CEST)
- Re: two nasty schemata, union types and surrogate keys Brian (Tue Oct 20 2009 - 15:14:27 CEST)
- Re: two nasty schemata, union types and surrogate keys David BL (Tue Oct 20 2009 - 17:11:06 CEST)
- Re: two nasty schemata, union types and surrogate keys rpost (Tue Oct 20 2009 - 21:18:47 CEST)
- Re: hamsterdb Transactional Storage (thanks to all of you) compdb_at_hotmail.com (Wed Oct 21 2009 - 03:39:11 CEST)
  - Re: hamsterdb Transactional Storage (thanks to all of you) paul c (Wed Oct 21 2009 - 06:03:06 CEST)
- Re: two nasty schemata, union types and surrogate keys Brian (Wed Oct 21 2009 - 04:35:24 CEST)
- Re: two nasty schemata, union types and surrogate keys Brian (Wed Oct 21 2009 - 05:09:49 CEST)
- Re: two nasty schemata, union types and surrogate keys David BL (Wed Oct 21 2009 - 06:46:15 CEST)
- Re: data modeling confessions, part 2 Sampo Syreeni (Wed Oct 21 2009 - 20:08:39 CEST)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Sampo Syreeni (Thu Oct 22 2009 - 00:36:47 CEST)
  - Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint paul c (Thu Oct 22 2009 - 02:47:28 CEST)
  - Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint paul c (Thu Oct 22 2009 - 19:22:01 CEST)
- Re: two nasty schemata, union types and surrogate keys Reinier Post (Thu Oct 22 2009 - 01:25:18 CEST)
- Re: two nasty schemata, union types and surrogate keys Reinier Post (Thu Oct 22 2009 - 01:38:20 CEST)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Mr. Scott (Thu Oct 22 2009 - 03:59:54 CEST)
  - Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint paul c (Thu Oct 22 2009 - 18:45:33 CEST)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Keith H Duggar (Thu Oct 22 2009 - 04:54:30 CEST)
  - Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint paul c (Thu Oct 22 2009 - 04:57:18 CEST)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Keith H Duggar (Thu Oct 22 2009 - 05:22:06 CEST)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Sampo Syreeni (Thu Oct 22 2009 - 13:34:22 CEST)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Nilone (Thu Oct 22 2009 - 14:40:52 CEST)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Mr. Scott (Thu Oct 22 2009 - 15:40:08 CEST)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Sampo Syreeni (Thu Oct 22 2009 - 21:16:53 CEST)
- Re: two nasty schemata, union types and surrogate keys Brian (Fri Oct 23 2009 - 05:54:18 CEST)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Keith H Duggar (Sat Oct 24 2009 - 19:53:07 CEST)
  - Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Bob Badour (Sat Oct 24 2009 - 21:13:32 CEST)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Keith H Duggar (Sat Oct 24 2009 - 23:03:23 CEST)
  - Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Bob Badour (Sun Oct 25 2009 - 01:07:09 CEST)
    - Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint paul c (Sun Oct 25 2009 - 04:47:17 CET)
      - Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Bob Badour (Sun Oct 25 2009 - 04:56:24 CET)
        
        Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint paul c (Sun Oct 25 2009 - 04:56:09 CET)
        
        Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Bob Badour (Sun Oct 25 2009 - 15:40:45 CET)
        
        Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint paul c (Sun Oct 25 2009 - 20:55:34 CET)
        
        Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Bob Badour (Sun Oct 25 2009 - 21:07:25 CET)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Cimode (Sun Oct 25 2009 - 08:24:01 CET)
  - Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint paul c (Mon Oct 26 2009 - 10:25:10 CET)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint compdb_at_hotmail.com (Sun Oct 25 2009 - 09:08:59 CET)
  - Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Bob Badour (Sun Oct 25 2009 - 15:44:56 CET)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Marshall (Sun Oct 25 2009 - 23:05:31 CET)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Marshall (Sun Oct 25 2009 - 23:09:53 CET)
  - Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Bob Badour (Mon Oct 26 2009 - 00:15:22 CET)
    - Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint paul c (Mon Oct 26 2009 - 01:05:47 CET)
      - Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Bob Badour (Mon Oct 26 2009 - 02:22:14 CET)
        
        Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint paul c (Mon Oct 26 2009 - 02:43:15 CET)
        
        Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Bob Badour (Mon Oct 26 2009 - 03:07:29 CET)
        
        Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint paul c (Mon Oct 26 2009 - 09:43:55 CET)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Sampo Syreeni (Sun Oct 25 2009 - 23:47:08 CET)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Sampo Syreeni (Sun Oct 25 2009 - 23:54:16 CET)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Marshall (Mon Oct 26 2009 - 06:17:02 CET)
  - Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Bob Badour (Mon Oct 26 2009 - 06:52:25 CET)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint compdb_at_hotmail.com (Mon Oct 26 2009 - 07:41:42 CET)
  - Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Bob Badour (Mon Oct 26 2009 - 14:26:42 CET)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Mr. Scott (Mon Oct 26 2009 - 08:06:29 CET)
  - Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint paul c (Mon Oct 26 2009 - 10:00:14 CET)
  - Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint paul c (Wed Oct 28 2009 - 19:41:48 CET)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint compdb_at_hotmail.com (Mon Oct 26 2009 - 10:51:26 CET)
- Re: two nasty schemata, union types and surrogate keys vldm10 (Mon Oct 26 2009 - 11:11:04 CET)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint vldm10 (Mon Oct 26 2009 - 11:20:52 CET)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Mr. Scott (Mon Oct 26 2009 - 14:15:43 CET)
  - Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint paul c (Mon Oct 26 2009 - 16:16:38 CET)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Tegiri Nenashi (Mon Oct 26 2009 - 17:27:58 CET)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Mr. Scott (Mon Oct 26 2009 - 20:01:43 CET)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Tegiri Nenashi (Mon Oct 26 2009 - 20:51:46 CET)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint rye (Tue Oct 27 2009 - 05:28:16 CET)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint compdb_at_hotmail.com (Tue Oct 27 2009 - 05:33:31 CET)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Marshall (Tue Oct 27 2009 - 05:52:22 CET)
  - Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Bob Badour (Tue Oct 27 2009 - 06:29:35 CET)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Cimode (Tue Oct 27 2009 - 13:34:04 CET)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Marshall (Tue Oct 27 2009 - 15:22:44 CET)
  - Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint paul c (Tue Oct 27 2009 - 17:33:26 CET)
    - Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Marshall (Wed Oct 28 2009 - 14:26:27 CET)
  - Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Bob Badour (Tue Oct 27 2009 - 17:41:48 CET)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Sampo Syreeni (Tue Oct 27 2009 - 17:27:01 CET)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint TroyK (Tue Oct 27 2009 - 20:41:33 CET)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint David BL (Wed Oct 28 2009 - 06:01:56 CET)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Marshall (Wed Oct 28 2009 - 14:31:37 CET)
  - Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Bob Badour (Wed Oct 28 2009 - 14:42:53 CET)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Marshall (Wed Oct 28 2009 - 14:35:20 CET)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Cimode (Wed Oct 28 2009 - 21:17:19 CET)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Tegiri Nenashi (Wed Oct 28 2009 - 21:29:32 CET)
  - Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint paul c (Wed Oct 28 2009 - 21:46:31 CET)
    - Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Bob Badour (Wed Oct 28 2009 - 23:41:28 CET)
      - Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint paul c (Wed Oct 28 2009 - 23:57:15 CET)
        
        Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint paul c (Thu Oct 29 2009 - 00:53:47 CET)
  - Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint paul c (Wed Oct 28 2009 - 21:54:42 CET)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Gene Wirchenko (Wed Oct 28 2009 - 23:59:29 CET)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Mr. Scott (Thu Oct 29 2009 - 00:19:59 CET)
  - Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint paul c (Thu Oct 29 2009 - 00:51:57 CET)
    - Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Bob Badour (Thu Oct 29 2009 - 01:41:41 CET)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Tegiri Nenashi (Thu Oct 29 2009 - 01:10:57 CET)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Mr. Scott (Thu Oct 29 2009 - 02:40:20 CET)
  - Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint paul c (Thu Oct 29 2009 - 03:58:04 CET)
  - Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint paul c (Thu Oct 29 2009 - 04:04:11 CET)
    - Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Bob Badour (Thu Oct 29 2009 - 04:09:30 CET)
      - Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint paul c (Thu Oct 29 2009 - 04:14:54 CET)
        
        Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Bob Badour (Thu Oct 29 2009 - 15:30:50 CET)
        
        Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint paul c (Fri Oct 30 2009 - 00:58:38 CET)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Mr. Scott (Thu Oct 29 2009 - 05:18:59 CET)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Mr. Scott (Thu Oct 29 2009 - 05:32:16 CET)
- Re: Codd's Information Principle Mr. Scott (Fri Oct 30 2009 - 00:38:57 CET)
  - Re: Codd's Information Principle paul c (Fri Oct 30 2009 - 00:53:50 CET)
    - Re: Codd's Information Principle paul c (Fri Oct 30 2009 - 00:55:23 CET)
- Re: Codd's Information Principle Mr. Scott (Fri Oct 30 2009 - 03:40:59 CET)
  - Re: Codd's Information Principle paul c (Fri Oct 30 2009 - 18:18:00 CET)
    - Re: Codd's Information Principle paul c (Fri Oct 30 2009 - 18:33:14 CET)
- Re: Adding history/versioning to a Nested Set model (is it possible?) Vladimir Odrljin (Fri Oct 30 2009 - 09:39:09 CET)
- Re: Adding history/versioning to a Nested Set model (is it possible?) Tegiri Nenashi (Fri Oct 30 2009 - 17:04:34 CET)
- Re: Adding history/versioning to a Nested Set model (is it possible?) Ed Lucas (Fri Oct 30 2009 - 17:37:39 CET)
- Re: Codd's Information Principle Cimode (Fri Oct 30 2009 - 19:30:12 CET)
  - Re: Codd's Information Principle paul c (Fri Oct 30 2009 - 19:41:51 CET)
- Re: Codd's Information Principle Cimode (Fri Oct 30 2009 - 20:37:30 CET)
- Re: Codd's Information Principle compdb_at_hotmail.com (Fri Oct 30 2009 - 20:46:20 CET)
  - Re: Codd's Information Principle paul c (Fri Oct 30 2009 - 20:58:00 CET)
    - Re: Codd's Information Principle paul c (Fri Oct 30 2009 - 21:28:40 CET)
    - Re: Codd's Information Principle Bob Badour (Fri Oct 30 2009 - 23:33:01 CET)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint compdb_at_hotmail.com (Sat Oct 31 2009 - 02:11:09 CET)
- Re: Codd's Information Principle Marshall (Sat Oct 31 2009 - 03:42:38 CET)
- Re: Codd's Information Principle compdb_at_hotmail.com (Sat Oct 31 2009 - 04:18:37 CET)
  - Re: Codd's Information Principle paul c (Sat Oct 31 2009 - 05:41:14 CET)
    - Re: Codd's Information Principle Bob Badour (Sat Oct 31 2009 - 13:00:20 CET)
      - Re: Codd's Information Principle paul c (Sat Oct 31 2009 - 21:03:30 CET)
- Re: Codd's Information Principle compdb_at_hotmail.com (Sat Oct 31 2009 - 04:24:31 CET)
- Re: Codd's Information Principle Mr. Scott (Sat Oct 31 2009 - 06:00:53 CET)
- Re: two nasty schemata, union types and surrogate keys Reinier Post (Sat Oct 31 2009 - 13:36:35 CET)
- Re: Codd's Information Principle Mr. Scott (Sat Oct 31 2009 - 18:03:26 CET)
- Re: Adding history/versioning to a Nested Set model (is it possible?) Vladimir Odrljin (Sat Oct 31 2009 - 19:03:47 CET)
- Re: Adding history/versioning to a Nested Set model (is it possible?) vldm10 (Sat Oct 31 2009 - 19:17:11 CET)
- Re: Codd's Information Principle vldm10 (Sat Oct 31 2009 - 23:16:20 CET)
Re: Can relational alegbra perform bulk operations? Walter Mitty (Thu Oct 01 2009 - 12:23:29 CEST)
- Re: Can relational alegbra perform bulk operations? Walter Mitty (Thu Oct 01 2009 - 12:28:29 CEST)
  - Re: Can relational alegbra perform bulk operations? Banana (Thu Oct 01 2009 - 18:31:59 CEST)
- Re: Can relational alegbra perform bulk operations? Tegiri Nenashi (Thu Oct 01 2009 - 19:03:11 CEST)
- Re: Can relational alegbra perform bulk operations? Tegiri Nenashi (Thu Oct 01 2009 - 19:08:33 CEST)
Re: Oracle: why should one specify the width of a number column? astaroth (Fri Oct 02 2009 - 19:56:12 CEST)
Re: view update in logic and relational databases rpost (Mon Oct 05 2009 - 19:31:14 CEST)
Re: two nasty schemata, union types and surrogate keys rpost (Mon Oct 05 2009 - 19:45:00 CEST)
- Re: two nasty schemata, union types and surrogate keys Brian (Mon Oct 05 2009 - 23:43:32 CEST)
In defence of the fat database laurip (Mon Oct 05 2009 - 23:28:26 CEST)
relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? lawpoop (Wed Oct 14 2009 - 22:24:59 CEST)
- Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? Bob Badour (Wed Oct 14 2009 - 22:44:18 CEST)
- Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? lawpoop (Wed Oct 14 2009 - 22:46:31 CEST)
  - Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one? Bob Badour (Wed Oct 14 2009 - 23:28:55 CEST)
data modeling confessions, part 1 Sampo Syreeni (Tue Oct 20 2009 - 03:29:23 CEST)
- Re: data modeling confessions, part 1 Tegiri Nenashi (Tue Oct 20 2009 - 04:23:26 CEST)
- Re: data modeling confessions, part 1 Roy Hann (Tue Oct 20 2009 - 09:22:03 CEST)
  - Re: data modeling confessions, part 2 Sampo Syreeni (Tue Oct 20 2009 - 17:56:57 CEST)
Join .Net Community Shawon_ (Tue Oct 20 2009 - 12:09:07 CEST)
foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Keith H Duggar (Wed Oct 21 2009 - 17:29:15 CEST)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Tegiri Nenashi (Wed Oct 21 2009 - 17:49:54 CEST)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Sampo Syreeni (Wed Oct 21 2009 - 18:05:25 CEST)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint paul c (Wed Oct 21 2009 - 21:15:34 CEST)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Sampo Syreeni (Wed Oct 21 2009 - 18:18:25 CEST)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Cimode (Wed Oct 21 2009 - 21:00:10 CEST)
multilevel modelling and constraints Sampo Syreeni (Sat Oct 24 2009 - 05:40:22 CEST)
Adding history/versioning to a Nested Set model (is it possible?) Ed Lucas (Wed Oct 28 2009 - 18:55:35 CET)
Codd's Information Principle paul c (Wed Oct 28 2009 - 20:51:26 CET)
relational lattices from boolean algebra perspective Vadim Tropashko (Fri Oct 30 2009 - 18:48:32 CET)

Last message date: Sat Oct 31 2009 - 23:16:20 CET
Archived on: Mon Jun 27 2016 - 00:11:04 CEST

237 messages sort by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ] [ subject ]
Nearby: [ About this archive ] [ Other mail archives ]