Re: Can relational alegbra perform bulk operations?
From: Tegiri Nenashi <tegirinenashi_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 10:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <2f6adee4-e5b8-4ec6-b6d3-7a494c24ba27_at_b25g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
On Sep 30, 9:17 pm, David BL <davi..._at_iinet.net.au> wrote:
> Claim: Under ZFC there is no set which is defined as the
> set of all sets.
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 10:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <2f6adee4-e5b8-4ec6-b6d3-7a494c24ba27_at_b25g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
On Sep 30, 9:17 pm, David BL <davi..._at_iinet.net.au> wrote:
> Claim: Under ZFC there is no set which is defined as the
> set of all sets.
In RM the level of curly brakets nesting never goes higher than two, so set theory paradoxes are irrelevant.
> Claim: The intersection operator is not a binary function
Isn't a binary operation on powerset boolean algebra? Received on Thu Oct 01 2009 - 12:08:33 CDT