Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint
From: Cimode <cimode_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 00:24:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <c9d6c490-ae6c-454e-9920-0634fa967e3b_at_g1g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 00:24:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <c9d6c490-ae6c-454e-9920-0634fa967e3b_at_g1g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>
On 25 oct, 04:56, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
> paul c wrote:
> > Bob Badour wrote:
> > ...
>
> >> You asked about semantic joinability. Semantically, the join works if
> >> like-named attributes have an equality comparison defined and not if
> >> they don't.
> >> ...
>
> > In RT, how could they not define equality?
>
> What reason would one have to define an equality comparison to compare
> employee ids with department ids or with names? Or charge with current
> or potential? Or age with price?
Hi paul,