Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one?
From: Gene Wirchenko <genew_at_ocis.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:25:34 -0700
Message-ID: <650id5tgf7vfoq0ai4ssi5dje7089lmeve_at_4ax.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:25:34 -0700
Message-ID: <650id5tgf7vfoq0ai4ssi5dje7089lmeve_at_4ax.com>
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:43:15 -0300, Bob Badour
<bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
[snip]
>That's certainly one type of mysticism. In this case, I think we have
>someone acting more like Alice with Humpty Dumpty. The name "donation"
>means exactly what the person who applied it to a table meant at the time.
More like Humpty Dumpty:
"'When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone,
'it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.'" --
"Through the Lookingglass"
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko Received on Sat Oct 17 2009 - 01:25:34 CEST