Re: view update in logic and relational databases
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 17:31:14 +0000 (UTC)
paul c wrote:
>Sampo Syreeni wrote:
>> Like most people around here, I periodically return to the view update
>> problem. I also subscribe to the idea that relational databases are
>> fundamentally about predicate logic, and that a proper interpretation
>> of the update problem probably has to be explained in logic terms. So
>> I'd like to offer one purely logical solution to the problem.
This has been studied extensively ...
>I think a more important question is whether a 'relational logic' that
>deals with views as well as it deals with base variables is somehow
>inconsistent or leads to contradictory conclusions.
Another is performance - answering queries must be feasible.
>Such a logic might
>not be comparable with traditional logic, but I'd say consistency is the
>more important quality for interpretation and optimization. I think it
>is most important to ask what a particular choice of logic buys us and
>what it doesn't, even if that might lead to a distortion of predicate
It doesn't, but you have to go beyond predicate logic because it isn't powerful enough.
(not that I have read all of those)
-- ReinierReceived on Mon Oct 05 2009 - 19:31:14 CEST