Re: relational reasoning -- why two tables and not one?

From: Bob Badour <>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:37:51 -0300
Message-ID: <4ad741d3$0$23744$>

paul c wrote:

> Roy Hann wrote:

>> ...
>> Can one have a donor who has not donated (yet)? ...

> That is a great question because it indicates the rampant database
> mysticism in the semi-literate so-called developed world. I'm sure
> there are db's where prospective donors are called donors and a donor
> isn't required to actually donate! Managers without budgets are similar.

I am not sure what you mean by mysticism. What part is mystical? What makes it mystical? Received on Thu Oct 15 2009 - 17:37:51 CEST

Original text of this message