Re: hamsterdb Transactional Storage (thanks to all of you)
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:57:03 GMT
Message-ID: <jr1Bm.48672$PH1.39852_at_edtnps82>
...
>
> What detritus or "features" do we have now that one could more
> accurately and more robustly model with user-defined types and type
> generators?
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:57:03 GMT
Message-ID: <jr1Bm.48672$PH1.39852_at_edtnps82>
Bob Badour wrote:
> paul c wrote:
>
>> Bob Badour wrote: >> >>> compdb_at_hotmail.com wrote:
...
>> And what "detritus" is avoided?
>
> What detritus or "features" do we have now that one could more
> accurately and more robustly model with user-defined types and type
> generators?