Re: hamsterdb Transactional Storage (thanks to all of you)
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:29:22 GMT
Message-ID: <6G3Bm.47967$Db2.44383_at_edtnps83>
>
> Not necessarily but not necessarily not either.
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:29:22 GMT
Message-ID: <6G3Bm.47967$Db2.44383_at_edtnps83>
Bob Badour wrote:
> paul c wrote:
>
>> Bob Badour wrote: >> ... >> >>> Sort of a "type sub-language"? ;) >> >> yes, and not necessarily a "sub-type sub-language"!
>
> Not necessarily but not necessarily not either.
I guess so (even though I still haven't gotten over the metric switch and still prefer B&W tv, nothing wrong with that whisky either). Received on Tue Oct 13 2009 - 20:29:22 CEST