- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Reinier Post (Sun Nov 01 2009 - 00:02:39 CET)
- Re: Codd's Information Principle compdb_at_hotmail.com (Sun Nov 01 2009 - 01:39:52 CET)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Mr. Scott (Sun Nov 01 2009 - 02:39:31 CET)
- Re: Adding history/versioning to a Nested Set model (is it possible?) -CELKO- (Sun Nov 01 2009 - 04:32:11 CET)
- Re: two nasty schemata, union types and surrogate keys Brian (Sun Nov 01 2009 - 15:37:44 CET)
- Re: Codd's Information Principle compdb_at_hotmail.com (Mon Nov 02 2009 - 00:36:31 CET)
- Re: Codd's Information Principle paul c (Mon Nov 02 2009 - 02:03:38 CET)
- Re: Codd's Information Principle Sampo Syreeni (Wed Nov 04 2009 - 22:25:53 CET)
- Re: Codd's Information Principle Cimode (Thu Nov 05 2009 - 19:54:06 CET)
- Re: Codd's Information Principle Cimode (Fri Nov 06 2009 - 00:08:53 CET)
- Re: Codd's Information Principle compdb_at_hotmail.com (Fri Nov 06 2009 - 01:19:53 CET)
- Re: Codd's Information Principle Cimode (Fri Nov 06 2009 - 19:54:38 CET)
- Re: Codd's Information Principle Tegiri Nenashi (Fri Nov 06 2009 - 23:00:24 CET)
- Re: Codd's Information Principle Cimode (Sat Nov 07 2009 - 00:00:19 CET)
- Re: Codd's Information Principle Cimode (Sat Nov 07 2009 - 00:02:11 CET)
- Re: Codd's Information Principle compdb_at_hotmail.com (Sat Nov 07 2009 - 02:19:07 CET)
- Re: Codd's Information Principle Tegiri Nenashi (Sat Nov 07 2009 - 03:37:43 CET)
- Re: Codd's Information Principle Tegiri Nenashi (Sat Nov 07 2009 - 04:11:00 CET)
- Re: Codd's Information Principle Tegiri Nenashi (Sat Nov 07 2009 - 04:26:36 CET)
- Re: Codd's Information Principle Tegiri Nenashi (Sat Nov 07 2009 - 04:57:53 CET)
- Re: Codd's Information Principle Tegiri Nenashi (Sat Nov 07 2009 - 05:07:00 CET)
- Re: Codd's Information Principle Cimode (Sat Nov 07 2009 - 14:18:01 CET)
- Re: Codd's Information Principle Cimode (Sat Nov 07 2009 - 14:25:41 CET)
- Re: Codd's Information Principle Cimode (Sat Nov 07 2009 - 14:28:16 CET)
- Re: two nasty schemata, union types and surrogate keys Reinier Post (Mon Nov 09 2009 - 00:37:10 CET)
- Re: two nasty schemata, union types and surrogate keys Brian (Mon Nov 09 2009 - 03:06:43 CET)
- Re: What would be a truly relational operating system ? paul c (Wed Nov 11 2009 - 06:39:51 CET)
- Re: What would be a truly relational operating system ? Casey Hawthorne (Thu Nov 12 2009 - 00:42:40 CET)
- Re: What would be a truly relational operating system ? Cimode (Thu Nov 12 2009 - 19:20:21 CET)
- Re: What would be a truly relational operating system ? Cimode (Thu Nov 12 2009 - 20:53:16 CET)
- Re: What would be a truly relational operating system ? Cimode (Thu Nov 12 2009 - 20:54:57 CET)
- Re: What would be a truly relational operating system ? Rob (Fri Nov 13 2009 - 17:09:20 CET)
- Re: What would be a truly relational operating system ? Cimode (Fri Nov 13 2009 - 19:36:14 CET)
- Re: What would be a truly relational operating system ? Cimode (Fri Nov 13 2009 - 22:02:20 CET)
- Re: What would be a truly relational operating system ? Anne & Lynn Wheeler (Sat Nov 14 2009 - 00:39:03 CET)
- Re: What would be a truly relational operating system ? Anne & Lynn Wheeler (Sat Nov 14 2009 - 01:48:26 CET)
- Re: What would be a truly relational operating system ? Cimode (Sat Nov 14 2009 - 01:49:26 CET)
- Re: ADR's Normalization question Mr. Scott (Sun Nov 15 2009 - 14:16:30 CET)
- Re: ADR's Normalization question Sampo Syreeni (Mon Nov 16 2009 - 22:23:14 CET)
- Re: ADR's Normalization question Mr. Scott (Tue Nov 17 2009 - 05:31:57 CET)
- Re: ADR's Normalization question Sampo Syreeni (Tue Nov 17 2009 - 18:40:35 CET)
- Re: teaching relational basics to people, questions compdb_at_hotmail.com (Wed Nov 18 2009 - 00:08:30 CET)
- Re: teaching relational basics to people, questions Casey Hawthorne (Wed Nov 18 2009 - 08:37:25 CET)
- Re: teaching relational basics to people, questions Sampo Syreeni (Wed Nov 18 2009 - 17:53:00 CET)
- Re: teaching relational basics to people, questions compdb_at_hotmail.com (Thu Nov 19 2009 - 04:56:48 CET)
- Re: teaching relational basics to people, questions Sampo Syreeni (Thu Nov 19 2009 - 10:32:41 CET)
- Re: Following up on the good argument for XML thread, JSON is simpler and more space efficient, and seems to be catching on as a data interchange format! Ben Finney (Fri Nov 20 2009 - 00:13:26 CET)
- Re: Following up on the good argument for XML thread, JSON is simpler and more space efficient, and seems to be catching on as a data interchange format! Casey Hawthorne (Fri Nov 20 2009 - 01:04:33 CET)
- Re: Following up on the good argument for XML thread, JSON is simpler and more space efficient, and seems to be catching on as a data interchange format! Ben Finney (Fri Nov 20 2009 - 01:19:47 CET)
- Re: teaching relational basics to people, questions compdb_at_hotmail.com (Fri Nov 20 2009 - 03:56:25 CET)
- Re: teaching relational basics to people, questions rpost (Fri Nov 20 2009 - 21:18:56 CET)
- Re: Following up on the good argument for XML thread, JSON is simpler and more space efficient, and seems to be catching on as a data interchange format! rpost (Fri Nov 20 2009 - 21:25:59 CET)
- Re: two nasty schemata, union types and surrogate keys Reinier Post (Fri Nov 20 2009 - 23:52:52 CET)
- Re: teaching relational basics to people, questions Sampo Syreeni (Sat Nov 21 2009 - 13:30:25 CET)
- Re: teaching relational basics to people, questions Roy Hann (Sat Nov 21 2009 - 17:24:20 CET)
- Re: teaching relational basics to people, questions Reinier Post (Sat Nov 21 2009 - 20:12:28 CET)
- Re: looking for another one of Codd's papers paul c (Sun Nov 22 2009 - 02:03:58 CET)
- Re: teaching relational basics to people, questions Mr. Scott (Sun Nov 22 2009 - 09:26:23 CET)
- Re: teaching relational basics to people, questions vldm10 (Sun Nov 22 2009 - 12:23:41 CET)
- Re: looking for another one of Codd's papers Cimode (Sun Nov 22 2009 - 17:13:24 CET)
- Re: teaching relational basics to people, questions toby (Sun Nov 22 2009 - 22:34:30 CET)
- Re: questionable history compdb_at_hotmail.com (Mon Nov 23 2009 - 04:27:51 CET)
- Re: teaching relational basics to people, questions vldm10 (Mon Nov 23 2009 - 11:23:07 CET)
- Re: teaching relational basics to people, questions Roy Hann (Mon Nov 23 2009 - 12:05:21 CET)
- Re: teaching relational basics to people, questions Mr. Scott (Thu Nov 26 2009 - 11:19:14 CET)
- Re: teaching relational basics to people, questions compdb_at_hotmail.com (Sat Nov 28 2009 - 03:53:19 CET)
- Re: teaching relational basics to people, questions compdb_at_hotmail.com (Sat Nov 28 2009 - 04:32:35 CET)
- Re: teaching relational basics to people, questions Mr. Scott (Sat Nov 28 2009 - 11:12:59 CET)
- Re: teaching relational basics to people, questions Mr. Scott (Sat Nov 28 2009 - 23:43:07 CET)
- Re: teaching relational basics to people, questions compdb_at_hotmail.com (Sun Nov 29 2009 - 00:45:59 CET)
- Re: teaching relational basics to people, questions Mr. Scott (Sun Nov 29 2009 - 09:31:25 CET)
- Re: teaching relational basics to people, questions vldm10 (Sun Nov 29 2009 - 18:03:34 CET)
- Re: Codd's Information Principle paul c (Sun Nov 01 2009 - 22:27:02 CET)
- Re: foreign key constraint versus referential integrity constraint Reinier Post (Sun Nov 01 2009 - 23:41:24 CET)
- Karachi Pakistan fatimaz-foundation-international Non Government Organization–NGO’s– dgdfgdg (Tue Nov 03 2009 - 18:56:27 CET)
- Re: relational lattices from boolean algebra perspective paul c (Sat Nov 07 2009 - 02:09:35 CET)
- CFP: ASONAM 2010 tanseletu_at_gmail.com (Sun Nov 08 2009 - 13:07:30 CET)
- What would be a truly relational operating system ? Cimode (Mon Nov 09 2009 - 13:19:30 CET)
- ADR's Normalization question paul c (Sat Nov 14 2009 - 01:00:41 CET)
- EISWT-10 Call for papers James Heralds (Sat Nov 14 2009 - 17:25:57 CET)
- teaching relational basics to people, questions Sampo Syreeni (Mon Nov 16 2009 - 20:42:21 CET)
- a brand new query tool is out on beta, we need feedback, so you get a free copy Mia (Wed Nov 18 2009 - 19:16:46 CET)
- Buy Panther Floral Heart Knit V-Neck Hoodie online!!! linda huang (Thu Nov 19 2009 - 06:38:33 CET)
- Following up on the good argument for XML thread, JSON is simpler and more space efficient, and seems to be catching on as a data interchange format! Casey Hawthorne (Thu Nov 19 2009 - 23:59:10 CET)
- looking for another one of Codd's papers paul c (Sat Nov 21 2009 - 18:16:58 CET)
- questionable history paul c (Sun Nov 22 2009 - 02:47:11 CET)
- CFP DATA MINING 2010: submissions until 19 February 2010 natty2006_at_gmail.com (Wed Nov 25 2009 - 12:02:01 CET)
- Last message date: Sun Nov 29 2009 - 18:03:34 CET
- Archived on: Mon Jun 27 2016 - 00:12:20 CEST
|