Re: ADR's Normalization question

From: Sampo Syreeni <decoy_at_iki.fi>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:23:14 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <c3f74b55-aa8e-4637-b600-12268417cbdd_at_w19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>



> The claim is due to Date's "otherwise quite independent" criterion. [...]

Okay, this is new to me, and given your further exposition, would appear highly nonstandard to me. Can you point me towards a freely available paper in which Date nails himself to the cross with this interpretation?

--
Sampo
Received on Mon Nov 16 2009 - 15:23:14 CST

Original text of this message