Re: ADR's Normalization question

From: Sampo Syreeni <decoy_at_iki.fi>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:23:14 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <c3f74b55-aa8e-4637-b600-12268417cbdd_at_w19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>

> The claim is due to Date's "otherwise quite independent" criterion. [...]

Okay, this is new to me, and given your further exposition, would appear highly nonstandard to me. Can you point me towards a freely available paper in which Date nails himself to the cross with this interpretation?

--
Sampo

Received on Mon Nov 16 2009 - 22:23:14 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: paul c: "Re: ADR's Normalization question"
Previous message: Sampo Syreeni: "teaching relational basics to people, questions"
Maybe in reply to: paul c: "ADR's Normalization question"
In reply to Mr. Scott: "Re: ADR's Normalization question"
Next in thread: paul c: "Re: ADR's Normalization question"
Reply: paul c: "Re: ADR's Normalization question"
Reply: Mr. Scott: "Re: ADR's Normalization question"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message