Following up on the good argument for XML thread, JSON is simpler and more space efficient, and seems to be catching on as a data interchange format!

From: Casey Hawthorne <caseyhHAMMER_TIME_at_istar.ca>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:59:10 -0800
Message-ID: <84jbg5hjinsa36nh2qga8cfe1uj89b9poo_at_4ax.com>



From: http://www.json.org/

JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) is a lightweight data-interchange format. It is easy for humans to read and write. It is easy for machines to parse and generate. It is based on a subset of the JavaScript Programming Language, Standard ECMA-262 3rd Edition - December 1999. JSON is a text format that is completely language independent but uses conventions that are familiar to programmers of the C-family of languages, including C, C++, C#, Java, JavaScript, Perl, Python, and many others. These properties make JSON an ideal data-interchange language.

JSON is built on two structures:

  • A collection of name/value pairs. In various languages, this is realized as an object, record, struct, dictionary, hash table, keyed list, or associative array.
  • An ordered list of values. In most languages, this is realized as an array, vector, list, or sequence.

These are universal data structures. Virtually all modern programming languages support them in one form or another. It makes sense that a data format that is interchangable with programming languages also be based on these structures.


I wonder what the trade-offs are between JSON, XML, and other data interchange formats.

--
Regards,
Casey
Received on Thu Nov 19 2009 - 23:59:10 CET

Original text of this message