Re: Following up on the good argument for XML thread, JSON is simpler and more space efficient, and seems to be catching on as a data interchange format!
From: Ben Finney <bignose+hates-spam_at_benfinney.id.au>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:13:26 +1100
Message-ID: <87einuglbd.fsf_at_benfinney.id.au>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:13:26 +1100
Message-ID: <87einuglbd.fsf_at_benfinney.id.au>
Casey Hawthorne <caseyhHAMMER_TIME_at_istar.ca> writes:
> I wonder what the trade-offs are between JSON, XML, and other data
> interchange formats.
I've found many programmers using YAML <URL:http://www.yaml.org/> as having the same advantages of JSON, with broad support in language libraries, while being even closer to human-readable representation of structure.
-- \ “A free press is one where it's okay to state the conclusion | `\ you're led to by the evidence.” —Bill Moyers | _o__) | Ben FinneyReceived on Fri Nov 20 2009 - 00:13:26 CET