- Saturday, 1 April 2006
- Sunday, 2 April 2006
- Monday, 3 April 2006
- Tuesday, 4 April 2006
- Wednesday, 5 April 2006
- Thursday, 6 April 2006
- Friday, 7 April 2006
- Saturday, 8 April 2006
- Sunday, 9 April 2006
- Monday, 10 April 2006
- Tuesday, 11 April 2006
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Neo
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: The stupidest design I ever saw Frank Hamersley
- Re: The stupidest design I ever saw Mikito Harakiri
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV dawn
- Re: The stupidest design I ever saw Neo
- Re: The stupidest design I ever saw dawn
- Re: Convert 1NF to 3NF Jonathan Leffler
- Re: Interesting article: In the Beginning: An RDBMS history x
- Re: Separation of Relational Engine from Domain Math Jon Heggland
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Jon Heggland
- Re: Convert 1NF to 3NF x
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV x
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV x
- Re: The stupidest design I ever saw JOG
- Re: The stupidest design I ever saw Alexandr Savinov
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV x
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV x
- Re: The stupidest design I ever saw Neo
- Re: The stupidest design I ever saw x
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Neo
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV B Faux
- Reinventing the TransRelational Model? Dan
- Re: Reinventing the TransRelational Model? Dan
- Re: The stupidest design I ever saw Neo
- Wednesday, 12 April 2006
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Neo
- Materialized attributes dawn
- Re: Reinventing the TransRelational Model? Frank Hamersley
- Re: Materialized attributes Frank Hamersley
- Re: Reinventing the TransRelational Model? falcon
- Re: Separation of Relational Engine from Domain Math -CELKO-
- Re: Materialized attributes dawn
- Re: Materialized attributes dawn
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface Nick Malik [Microsoft]
- Re: Reinventing the TransRelational Model? x
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Jay Dee
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV x
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Neo
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV x
- Re: The stupidest design I ever saw x
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV x
- Re: THe OverRelational Manifesto (ORM) U-gene
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Neo
- Re: Reinventing the TransRelational Model? Jan Hidders
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface Jan Hidders
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV dawn
- Re: Reinventing the TransRelational Model? paul c
- abnormal forms paul c
- Oracle Buys Portal Software technology_post_at_yahoo.com
- Re: abnormal forms paul c
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV David Portas
- Re: Reinventing the TransRelational Model? Dan
- Re: Reinventing the TransRelational Model? Dan
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Neo
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface topmind
- Thursday, 13 April 2006
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Neo
- Re: Reinventing the TransRelational Model? falcon
- Re: Reinventing the TransRelational Model? falcon
- Re: Reinventing the TransRelational Model? paul c
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Jay Dee
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Neo
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface Neo
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface Neo
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface x
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface x
- Re: Reinventing the TransRelational Model? x
- Re: Reinventing the TransRelational Model? x
- Re: Reinventing the TransRelational Model? x
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface Neo
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface x
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV x
- Re: abnormal forms x
- Re: abnormal forms x
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV x
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface Neo
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Neo
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: abnormal forms Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Dimension in Data Warehouse Lukasz
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Neo
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV David Portas
- Re: THe OverRelational Manifesto (ORM) Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Neo
- Friday, 14 April 2006
- Modeling zip+4 dawn
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface Neo
- Re: Modeling zip+4 Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface Nick Malik [Microsoft]
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV dawn
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface Neo
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Neo
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV x
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Neo
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface x
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV x
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV x
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV x
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV x
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV x
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface Jan Hidders
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Neo
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Neo
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV x
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV x
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Tedd
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV B Faux
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV B Faux
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Neo
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Neo
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Neo
- Saturday, 15 April 2006
- Sunday, 16 April 2006
- Re: IDJIT! Your Data Model Can't Posssibly Work! Hugo Kornelis
- Re: IDJIT! Your Data Model Can't Posssibly Work! paul c
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Brian Selzer
- Re: IDJIT! Your Data Model Can't Posssibly Work! Neo
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface topmind
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface JOG
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface Bob Badour
- Re: THe OverRelational Manifesto (ORM) Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: IDIOT! Your Data Model Can't Possibly Work! Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: abnormal forms Bob Badour
- Re: IDIOT! Your Data Model Can't Possibly Work! Bob Badour
- Re: IDJIT! Your Data Model Can't Posssibly Work! Bob Badour
- Re: IDJIT! Your Data Model Can't Posssibly Work! Bob Badour
- Re: IDJIT! Your Data Model Can't Posssibly Work! Bob Badour
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface Bob Badour
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface Bob Badour
- Re: THe OverRelational Manifesto (ORM) U-gene
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface Marshall Spight
- Re: abnormal forms Marshall Spight
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface Marshall Spight
- Re: abnormal forms Bob Badour
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface Bob Badour
- Monday, 17 April 2006
- Tuesday, 18 April 2006
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface Neo
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface Neo
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Neo
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface topmind
- Entity Overlap and Relationships GB
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface x
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface x
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface x
- Re: IDJIT! Your Data Model Can't Posssibly Work! Neo
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV x
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV x
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV x
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV x
- Re: THe OverRelational Manifesto (ORM) U-gene
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV x
- Re: Relational lattice completeness Jan Hidders
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface Bob Badour
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV x
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV x
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: Relational lattice completeness Jan Hidders
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: Entity Overlap and Relationships Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV dawn
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV x
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV x
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV dawn
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface x
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV x
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface Neo
- Re: THe OverRelational Manifesto (ORM) U-gene
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Tedd
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV dawn
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV B Faux
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Tedd
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV B Faux
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV dawn
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface Neo
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV dawn
- Re: Relational lattice completeness Marshall Spight
- Wednesday, 19 April 2006
- Thursday, 20 April 2006
- Re: IDJIT! Your Data Model Can't Posssibly Work! Neo
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface Neo
- Re: IDJIT! Your Data Model Can't Posssibly Work! Hugo Kornelis
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface JOG
- Re: IDJIT! Your Data Model Can't Posssibly Work! Bob Badour
- Re: IDJIT! Your Data Model Can't Posssibly Work! Neo
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface Bob Badour
- Re: IDJIT! Your Data Model Can't Posssibly Work! Neo
- Order By Chino
- Re: Order By Marshall Spight
- Re: Order By Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Entity Overlap and Relationships GB
- Re: Entity Overlap and Relationships GB
- Re: Order By Marshall Spight
- Re: Best way to set up David Cressey
- Lucid statement of the MV vs RM position? ralphbecket_at_gmail.com
- Re: Order By Chino
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Brian Selzer
- Re: THe OverRelational Manifesto (ORM) U-gene
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Marshall Spight
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Frank Hamersley
- Re: IDJIT! Your Data Model Can't Posssibly Work! strider5
- Re: THe OverRelational Manifesto (ORM) Marshall Spight
- Re: IDJIT! Your Data Model Can't Posssibly Work! x
- Re: IDJIT! Your Data Model Can't Posssibly Work! x
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface x
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface x
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV x
- Re: Entity Overlap and Relationships dawn
- Re: IDJIT! Your Data Model Can't Posssibly Work! Neo
- Re: IDJIT! Your Data Model Can't Posssibly Work! Neo
- Re: THe OverRelational Manifesto (ORM) Bob Badour
- Re: IDJIT! Your Data Model Can't Posssibly Work! x
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: Entity Overlap and Relationships Bob Badour
- Re: Best way to set up Bob Badour
- Re: Lucid statement of the MV vs RM position? Bob Badour
- Re: THe OverRelational Manifesto (ORM) Dave Greenwood
- Has E/R had a negative impact on db? JOG
- Re: IDJIT! Your Data Model Can't Posssibly Work! Neo
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Jon Heggland
- Re: THe OverRelational Manifesto (ORM) Bob Badour
- Re: IDJIT! Your Data Model Can't Posssibly Work! Bob Badour
- Re: IDJIT! Your Data Model Can't Posssibly Work! Neo
- Re: Has E/R had a negative impact on db? Jon Heggland
- Re: Has E/R had a negative impact on db? SD
- Re: THe OverRelational Manifesto (ORM) Alfredo Novoa
- Re: THe OverRelational Manifesto (ORM) Alfredo Novoa
- Re: Entity Overlap and Relationships dawn
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Marshall Spight
- Re: Has E/R had a negative impact on db? Bob Badour
- Re: Lucid statement of the MV vs RM position? dawn
- Re: THe OverRelational Manifesto (ORM) Bob Badour
- Re: THe OverRelational Manifesto (ORM) JOG
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV dawn
- Re: THe OverRelational Manifesto (ORM) Bob Badour
- Re: THe OverRelational Manifesto (ORM) Alfredo Novoa
- Re: IDJIT! Your Data Model Can't Posssibly Work! Marshall Spight
- Re: IDJIT! Your Data Model Can't Posssibly Work! Bob Badour
- Re: THe OverRelational Manifesto (ORM) Marshall Spight
- Re: THe OverRelational Manifesto (ORM) Marshall Spight
- Re: THe OverRelational Manifesto (ORM) Marshall Spight
- Re: THe OverRelational Manifesto (ORM) Bob Badour
- Re: THe OverRelational Manifesto (ORM) Bob Badour
- Re: THe OverRelational Manifesto (ORM) Bob Badour
- Re: THe OverRelational Manifesto (ORM) Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV B Faux
- Re: Has E/R had a negative impact on db? JOG
- Re: Entity Overlap and Relationships Gene Wirchenko
- Re: THe OverRelational Manifesto (ORM) Marshall Spight
- Re: abnormal forms paul c
- Re: THe OverRelational Manifesto (ORM) Gene Wirchenko
- Re: THe OverRelational Manifesto (ORM) Marshall Spight
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Marshall Spight
- Re: THe OverRelational Manifesto (ORM) Bob Badour
- Re: Entity Overlap and Relationships dawn
- Re: abnormal forms Bob Badour
- Re: Entity Overlap and Relationships Mikito Harakiri
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface Neo
- Re: THe OverRelational Manifesto (ORM) Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Gene Wirchenko
- Re: IDJIT! Your Data Model Can't Posssibly Work! Hugo Kornelis
- Re: IDJIT! Your Data Model Can't Posssibly Work! Hugo Kornelis
- Re: Entity Overlap and Relationships Gene Wirchenko
- Re: IDJIT! Your Data Model Can't Posssibly Work! Hugo Kornelis
- Re: Reinventing the TransRelational Model? vldm10
- Re: Lucid statement of the MV vs RM position? Pickie
- Re: abnormal forms paul c
- Re: Lucid statement of the MV vs RM position? Mikito Harakiri
- Friday, 21 April 2006
- Saturday, 22 April 2006
- Sunday, 23 April 2006
- Monday, 24 April 2006
- Tuesday, 25 April 2006
- Re: Lucid statement of the MV vs RM position? dawn
- Re: efficient compare David Cressey
- Re: Has E/R had a negative impact on db? Jan Hidders
- Re: Has E/R had a negative impact on db? David Cressey
- Re: Has E/R had a negative impact on db? mAsterdam
- Re: Lucid statement of the MV vs RM position? David Cressey
- Re: Lucid statement of the MV vs RM position? David Cressey
- Re: Lucid statement of the MV vs RM position? Bob Badour
- Re: Lucid statement of the MV vs RM position? dawn
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV DonR
- Re: Has E/R had a negative impact on db? dawn
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV dawn
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV DonR
- Re: Has E/R had a negative impact on db? paul c
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Mikito Harakiri
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface Neo
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Marshall Spight
- Re: Has E/R had a negative impact on db? mAsterdam
- Re: Lucid statement of the MV vs RM position? Jon Heggland
- Re: Lucid statement of the MV vs RM position? Tony Andrews
- Re: Has E/R had a negative impact on db? J M Davitt
- Re: Reflections of a beautiful mind... Fundamental principle: Separation of Concerns Frank Hamersley
- Re: Lucid statement of the MV vs RM position? David Cressey
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV x
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Jan Hidders
- Re: All hail Neo! Frank Hamersley
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Frank Hamersley
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV David Cressey
- Re: Lucid statement of the MV vs RM position? Frank Hamersley
- Re: Has E/R had a negative impact on db? Jan Hidders
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Brian Selzer
- Re: efficient compare Andersen
- Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV Bob Badour
- Re: Reflections of a beautiful mind... Fundamental principle: Separation of Concerns Bob Badour
- Re: efficient compare Jan Hidders
- Re: All hail Neo! Bob Badour
- Re: Lucid statement of the MV vs RM position? Jan Hidders
- Re: Lucid statement of the MV vs RM position? Bob Badour
- Re: Has E/R had a negative impact on db? Neo
- Re: Lucid statement of the MV vs RM position? Jan Hidders
- Re: efficient compare David Cressey
- Wednesday, 26 April 2006
- Thursday, 27 April 2006
- Friday, 28 April 2006
- Saturday, 29 April 2006
- Sunday, 30 April 2006
- Last message date: Sun Apr 30 2006 - 23:57:12 CEST
- Archived on: Sun Jun 26 2016 - 17:45:15 CEST
|
