Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 20:43:55 GMT
Message-ID: <fKy%f.59463$VV4.1097654_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
>
>
> I didn't understand.
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 20:43:55 GMT
Message-ID: <fKy%f.59463$VV4.1097654_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
Neo wrote:
>>>In RM, the proper method of allowing an attribute to have multiple >>>values is to have a separate table.
>
>>No. You just change the key definition :-)
>
> I didn't understand.
That's a given. It's redundant for you to state it. Received on Thu Apr 13 2006 - 22:43:55 CEST