Re: The stupidest design I ever saw

From: Andy Dingley <dingbat_at_codesmiths.com> <dingbat_at_codesmiths.com>
Date: 6 Apr 2006 03:10:59 -0700
Message-ID: <1144318259.675811.18090_at_t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>


Mikito Harakiri wrote:

> Andy's posting history doesn't leave any doubt that he is serious.

8-) I hear the Pope has a bit of thing about heresy too.

> Anyway, the link to RDF turned out to be informative.

Can I please ask a couple of things of people posting to this thread

  If you're a c.d.t regular and you x-post into c.t.x, then please post some links back to context. I get the feeling I've fallen into an old argument here and I don't know what the background is.

Secondly, if you look at RDF stuff, then look at the W3C documentation pack from early 2004.
http://www.w3.org/RDF/
The docs before this date were unfriendly and unclear (to say the least) and the Feb2004 rewrite was a damn good bit of work - it's worth reading the right version. Anything older than this (particularly last century) is quite probably very misleading.

Now, let battle commence! Received on Thu Apr 06 2006 - 12:10:59 CEST

Original text of this message