Re: Lucid statement of the MV vs RM position?
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 23:18:11 GMT
Message-ID: <TEU1g.52760$WI1.20161_at_pd7tw2no>
>
>
> You certainly meant to say:
> "In the Multi-Value model there is no *model* as such."
> ?
>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 23:18:11 GMT
Message-ID: <TEU1g.52760$WI1.20161_at_pd7tw2no>
Mikito Harakiri wrote:
> Pickie wrote:
>
>>http://www.pickwiki.com/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?PhilosophyOfPick gives my views >>I think even Bob would agree with this >>quote - "In the Multi-Value model there is no DBMS as such."
>
>
> You certainly meant to say:
> "In the Multi-Value model there is no *model* as such."
> ?
>
Have the pickle people ever implemented the RM with a pickle product? This seems like a useful project if the pickle products are so great. Heh, maybe the person who wrote the checkers program could write a pickle product in sql.
p Received on Fri Apr 21 2006 - 01:18:11 CEST