Re: The stupidest design I ever saw
From: dawn <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com>
Date: 5 Apr 2006 20:07:19 -0700
Message-ID: <1144292839.227113.149270_at_i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
Date: 5 Apr 2006 20:07:19 -0700
Message-ID: <1144292839.227113.149270_at_i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
Vadim Tropashko wrote:
> Neo wrote:
> > > The folks who wrote this apparently have no idea that graph is defined by the set of nodes and edges between them. They wrap their naive understanding what the graph is into XML cludgy syntax and claim it to be a superior solution.
> > .
> > What is the better solution? Could you show it (possibly using the
> > vehicle classes above)?
>
> To what kind of problem? Do you really insist on vehicle classification
> in the first place? You may want spend some time on Bruce Jacobs site
> where he advocates that classification system for data management
> problems is a poor solution in general.
Could you provide a URL for his site? Thanks. --dawn Received on Thu Apr 06 2006 - 05:07:19 CEST