- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Jerome H. Gitomer (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 00:24:13 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Dawn M. Wolthuis (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 00:37:47 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints ben brugman (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 09:48:14 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints ben brugman (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 10:38:38 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Tony (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 12:01:58 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Marshall Spight (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 17:15:56 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints ben brugman (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 18:08:39 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Dawn M. Wolthuis (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 23:53:32 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Bob Badour (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 05:07:22 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Bob Badour (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 05:20:22 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Bob Badour (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 05:29:59 CET)
- Re: Where can i find the original database rules from Codd? Tobias Faust (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 09:00:42 CET)
- Re: Where can i find the original database rules from Codd? Nigel Pendse (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 10:04:50 CET)
- Re: Where can i find the original database rules from Codd? Tobias Faust (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 09:59:34 CET)
- Re: Where can i find the original database rules from Codd? Alfredo Novoa (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 10:42:22 CET)
- Re: Codd provided appropriate mathematics ... (was Re: Relational and MV (response to "foundations of relational theory")) Alfredo Novoa (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 10:55:32 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Alfredo Novoa (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:01:16 CET)
- Re: Where can i find the original database rules from Codd? Tobias Faust (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 10:58:31 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? ben brugman (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 11:15:40 CET)
- Re: Where can i find the original database rules from Codd? fermat (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 12:18:31 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Tony (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 12:20:37 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Tony (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 12:40:00 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Alfredo Novoa (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 13:18:46 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? ben brugman (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 14:10:21 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? ben brugman (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 15:19:07 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Dawn M. Wolthuis (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 15:24:49 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Dataman (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 15:36:13 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Alfredo Novoa (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 16:22:28 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? ben brugman (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 16:45:32 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Bob Badour (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 16:45:28 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Bob Badour (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 16:45:53 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Mikito Harakiri (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 18:13:53 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Mikito Harakiri (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 18:23:56 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? ben brugman (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 19:43:57 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? ben brugman (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 19:52:26 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? --CELKO-- (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:02:15 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Tony (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:20:21 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Christopher Browne (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 21:52:36 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Alfredo Novoa (Tue Mar 02 2004 - 23:31:05 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Dawn M. Wolthuis (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 00:13:29 CET)
- Re: Where can i find the original database rules from Codd? Tobias Faust (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 08:29:45 CET)
- rdbms portal software & change management (was Re: Multiple specification of constraints) mountain man (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 08:54:38 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? mountain man (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 08:54:38 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? mountain man (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 08:54:40 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? mountain man (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 08:54:39 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Marshall Spight (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 09:16:18 CET)
- Re: Where can i find the original database rules from Codd? Matthias Klaey (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 10:15:24 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Roy Hann (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 10:45:23 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Alfredo Novoa (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 11:34:54 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Alfredo Novoa (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 11:36:55 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Tony (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 12:55:55 CET)
- Re: Codd provided appropriate mathematics ... (was Re: Relational and MV (response to "foundations of relational theory")) Eric Kaun (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 14:41:28 CET)
- Re: Codd provided appropriate mathematics ... (was Re: Relational and MV (response to "foundations of relational theory")) Eric Kaun (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 14:44:42 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? ben brugman (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 15:13:24 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Eric Kaun (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 15:37:48 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Tony (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 16:28:05 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Eric Kaun (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 16:30:53 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Eric Kaun (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 16:44:35 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Eric Kaun (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 16:46:50 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Eric Kaun (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 17:01:29 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Eric Kaun (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 17:12:07 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Eric Kaun (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 17:16:36 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Eric Kaun (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 17:28:29 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Eric Kaun (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 17:33:42 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Eric Kaun (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 18:38:24 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Dawn M. Wolthuis (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 19:42:40 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Dawn M. Wolthuis (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 19:50:10 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Dawn M. Wolthuis (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 19:53:06 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Dawn M. Wolthuis (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 20:30:38 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Dawn M. Wolthuis (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 20:40:25 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Paul (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 22:04:47 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Roy Hann (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 22:11:30 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Dawn M. Wolthuis (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 22:30:37 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Tony (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 22:39:56 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Dawn M. Wolthuis (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 23:03:14 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Eric Kaun (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 23:20:58 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Bob Badour (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 23:46:33 CET)
- Re: Codd provided appropriate mathematics ... (was Re: Relational and MV (response to "foundations of relational theory")) Bob Badour (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 23:57:14 CET)
- Re: Codd provided appropriate mathematics ... (was Re: Relational and MV (response to "foundations of relational theory")) Bob Badour (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 00:00:29 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Bob Badour (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 00:05:34 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Bob Badour (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 00:06:26 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Bob Badour (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 00:08:48 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Bob Badour (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 00:11:16 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Bob Badour (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 00:13:14 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Alfredo Novoa (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 01:11:18 CET)
- Re: Codd provided appropriate mathematics ... (was Re: Relational and MV (response to "foundations of relational theory")) Dawn M. Wolthuis (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 01:43:02 CET)
- Re: Tree (forest) design Neo (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 01:52:28 CET)
- Re: object algebra Neo (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 02:14:33 CET)
- Re: object algebra Dawn M. Wolthuis (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 02:22:02 CET)
- Re: object algebra Neo (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 02:32:57 CET)
- Re: object algebra Neo (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 02:41:57 CET)
- Re: Tree (forest) design Mikito Harakiri (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 02:52:52 CET)
- Re: Codd provided appropriate mathematics ... (was Re: Relational and MV (response to "foundations of relational theory")) Marshall Spight (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 04:21:37 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Marshall Spight (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 04:25:31 CET)
- Re: Codd provided appropriate mathematics ... (was Re: Relational and MV (response to "foundations of relational theory")) Laura Hirsh (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 05:47:21 CET)
- Re: object algebra Chris Hoess (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 06:03:19 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Christopher Browne (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 06:30:02 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints ben brugman (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 10:49:22 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? ben brugman (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 10:54:10 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? ben brugman (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 10:59:53 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? ben brugman (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 11:05:01 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? mountain man (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 11:37:00 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Tony (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 11:51:22 CET)
- Re: object algebra Tony (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 12:05:48 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Tony (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 12:11:11 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Tony (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 12:28:29 CET)
- Re: Any new thoughts on OTLT (One True Lookup Table) Tony (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 12:40:15 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Roy Hann (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 13:21:59 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Dawn M. Wolthuis (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:22:43 CET)
- Re: Codd provided appropriate mathematics ... (was Re: Relational and MV (response to "foundations of relational theory")) Eric Kaun (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:15:09 CET)
- Re: object algebra Eric Kaun (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:22:19 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Roy Hann (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:43:15 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Eric Kaun (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:30:19 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Eric Kaun (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:36:49 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Eric Kaun (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:39:48 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Eric Kaun (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:40:09 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Eric Kaun (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:43:52 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Dataman (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 15:05:44 CET)
- Re: Where can i find the original database rules from Codd? Tobias Faust (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 15:01:16 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Eric Kaun (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:56:35 CET)
- Re: Where can i find the original database rules from Codd? Matthias Klaey (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 15:58:33 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Tony (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 16:11:08 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Alfredo Novoa (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 18:47:32 CET)
- Re: Tree (forest) design Neo (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 19:48:30 CET)
- Re: object algebra Paul Vernon (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 19:37:42 CET)
- Re: Tree (forest) design Neo (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 20:09:42 CET)
- Re: object algebra Neo (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 20:33:44 CET)
- Re: Tree (forest) design Mikito Harakiri (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 20:36:08 CET)
- Re: object algebra Eric Kaun (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 20:50:25 CET)
- Re: object algebra Neo (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 21:04:26 CET)
- Re: object algebra Neo (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 21:20:56 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Eric Kaun (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 21:40:39 CET)
- Re: object algebra Neo (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 21:41:52 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Eric Kaun (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 21:49:01 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Eric Kaun (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 21:53:53 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Eric Kaun (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 21:56:33 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Eric Kaun (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 21:57:45 CET)
- Re: object algebra Neo (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 22:08:40 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? --CELKO-- (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 22:21:20 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Mikito Harakiri (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 22:28:03 CET)
- Re: Tree (forest) design --CELKO-- (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 23:30:56 CET)
- Re: object algebra Neo (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 23:47:21 CET)
- Re: object algebra Neo (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 23:52:58 CET)
- Re: object algebra Mikito Harakiri (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 00:08:51 CET)
- Re: object algebra Marshall Spight (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 02:13:23 CET)
- Re: object algebra Christopher Browne (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 03:48:50 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Marshall Spight (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 05:48:27 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Marshall Spight (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 05:53:55 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? mountain man (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 08:29:35 CET)
- Re: Any new thoughts on OTLT (One True Lookup Table) Ruud de Koter (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 08:50:02 CET)
- Re: A foreign key on a self-referring table Andrea Laforgia (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 08:58:19 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Tony (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 11:48:49 CET)
- Re: A foreign key on a self-referring table Tony (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 12:45:24 CET)
- Re: Any new thoughts on OTLT (One True Lookup Table) Tony (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 13:04:04 CET)
- Re: A foreign key on a self-referring table Andrea Laforgia (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 13:07:59 CET)
- Re: object algebra Tony (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 13:15:18 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Corey Brown (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 14:11:43 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Eric Kaun (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 14:33:40 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Eric Kaun (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 14:36:09 CET)
- Re: object algebra Eric Kaun (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 14:37:32 CET)
- Re: object algebra Eric Kaun (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 14:39:58 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Mike Sherrill (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 15:17:48 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Corey Brown (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 15:37:03 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Eric Kaun (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 15:49:03 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Peter Koch Larsen (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 16:36:36 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Corey Brown (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 16:41:30 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Dawn M. Wolthuis (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 16:44:07 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Dawn M. Wolthuis (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 17:41:57 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Eric Kaun (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 17:55:35 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Dawn M. Wolthuis (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 18:06:11 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints ben brugman (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 18:24:24 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Eric Kaun (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 18:24:41 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? ben brugman (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 18:44:23 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Dawn M. Wolthuis (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 18:47:14 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Mikito Harakiri (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 18:52:34 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Mikito Harakiri (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 19:12:06 CET)
- Re: object algebra Neo (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 19:40:23 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Dawn M. Wolthuis (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 19:41:50 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Corey Brown (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 19:58:21 CET)
- Re: object algebra Neo (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 20:16:12 CET)
- Re: object algebra Neo (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 20:32:00 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Mikito Harakiri (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 20:45:38 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Eric Kaun (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 21:26:25 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Dawn M. Wolthuis (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 21:41:52 CET)
- Re: Tree (forest) design Neo (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 21:47:18 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Eric Kaun (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 21:55:21 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Eric Kaun (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 22:07:31 CET)
- Re: Tree (forest) design Neo (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 22:41:23 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Dawn M. Wolthuis (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 22:49:09 CET)
- Re: Tree (forest) design Mikito Harakiri (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 22:49:08 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Dawn M. Wolthuis (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 23:08:04 CET)
- Re: Tree (forest) design Mikito Harakiri (Fri Mar 05 2004 - 23:16:06 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? mountain man (Sat Mar 06 2004 - 01:21:12 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Corey Brown (Sat Mar 06 2004 - 01:31:37 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Corey Brown (Sat Mar 06 2004 - 01:35:46 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Paul (Sat Mar 06 2004 - 01:40:52 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Mikito Harakiri (Sat Mar 06 2004 - 02:15:10 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Mikito Harakiri (Sat Mar 06 2004 - 02:34:47 CET)
- Re: Tree (forest) design Neo (Sat Mar 06 2004 - 06:24:12 CET)
- Re: Tree (forest) design Neo (Sat Mar 06 2004 - 06:43:00 CET)
- Re: Tree (forest) design Neo (Sat Mar 06 2004 - 07:35:48 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? mountain man (Sat Mar 06 2004 - 07:41:41 CET)
- Re: Tree (forest) design Neo (Sat Mar 06 2004 - 07:51:50 CET)
- Re: object algebra Mike Sherrill (Sat Mar 06 2004 - 13:27:34 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Corey Brown (Sat Mar 06 2004 - 16:32:42 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Corey Brown (Sat Mar 06 2004 - 16:37:06 CET)
- Re: A foreign key on a self-referring table Gianluca Hotz (Sat Mar 06 2004 - 18:03:06 CET)
- Re: A foreign key on a self-referring table Gianluca Hotz (Sat Mar 06 2004 - 18:12:45 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Mikito Harakiri (Sat Mar 06 2004 - 21:02:15 CET)
- Re: Tree (forest) design Mikito Harakiri (Sat Mar 06 2004 - 21:10:03 CET)
- Re: A foreign key on a self-referring table daveb (Sat Mar 06 2004 - 21:10:30 CET)
- Re: object algebra Neo (Sat Mar 06 2004 - 21:37:11 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Corey Brown (Sun Mar 07 2004 - 00:04:42 CET)
- Re: A foreign key on a self-referring table daveb (Sun Mar 07 2004 - 02:12:20 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints mountain man (Sun Mar 07 2004 - 02:20:12 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Mikito Harakiri (Sun Mar 07 2004 - 09:42:05 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? ben brugman (Sun Mar 07 2004 - 14:15:23 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints ben brugman (Sun Mar 07 2004 - 14:28:20 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Corey Brown (Sun Mar 07 2004 - 14:31:10 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Dawn M. Wolthuis (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 02:01:21 CET)
- Re: object algebra Marshall Spight (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 09:15:14 CET)
- Re: Tree (forest) design Marshall Spight (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 09:18:45 CET)
- Re: A foreign key on a self-referring table Andrea Laforgia (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 09:56:12 CET)
- Re: third manifesto implementations? Lennart Jonsson (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 11:03:10 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? ben brugman (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 14:24:53 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Eric Kaun (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 14:52:44 CET)
- Re: Any new thoughts on OTLT (One True Lookup Table) Ruud de Koter (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 15:13:38 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Eric Kaun (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 15:32:10 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints ben brugman (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 16:43:34 CET)
- Re: Any new thoughts on OTLT (One True Lookup Table) ben brugman (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 17:02:09 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Eric Kaun (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 17:49:12 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Mikito Harakiri (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 18:31:07 CET)
- Re: A foreign key on a self-referring table Gianluca Hotz (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 19:01:34 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Dawn M. Wolthuis (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 19:31:43 CET)
- Re: object algebra Mikito Harakiri (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 19:48:02 CET)
- Re: Tree (forest) design Neo (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 20:08:44 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints mountain man (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 21:35:41 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Eric Kaun (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 21:47:12 CET)
- Re: object algebra Marshall Spight (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 21:57:15 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? --CELKO-- (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 23:27:51 CET)
- Re: object algebra Neo (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 19:39:12 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Dawn M. Wolthuis (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 04:15:30 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Dawn M. Wolthuis (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 04:26:46 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Dawn M. Wolthuis (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 04:39:17 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? Tony (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 11:21:53 CET)
- Re: third manifesto implementations? Lennart Jonsson (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 12:49:28 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints mountain man (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 13:38:28 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints ben brugman (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 14:23:03 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? Fabian Buettner (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 14:35:19 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? ben brugman (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 14:36:05 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints ben brugman (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 14:58:33 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Eric Kaun (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 15:05:35 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Dawn M. Wolthuis (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 15:33:31 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? ben brugman (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 15:49:22 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Eric Kaun (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 16:00:19 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Dawn M. Wolthuis (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 16:43:17 CET)
- Re: object algebra Neo (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 18:14:13 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Eric Kaun (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 20:30:22 CET)
- Re: Testing Various Data Models? Dawn M. Wolthuis (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 00:17:35 CET)
- Re: Idea for concurrent transactions Christopher Browne (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 00:23:54 CET)
- Re: implementing a index for wildcard text search mountain man (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 01:07:41 CET)
- Re: implementing a index for wildcard text search Achim Domma (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 01:13:48 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? Bob Badour (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 03:29:59 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? Bob Badour (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 03:30:57 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Bob Badour (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 03:37:02 CET)
- Re: Codd provided appropriate mathematics ... (was Re: Relational and MV (response to "foundations of relational theory")) Bob Badour (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 03:42:48 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Bob Badour (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 03:57:07 CET)
- Re: object algebra Bob Badour (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 03:48:18 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? Dawn M. Wolthuis (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 04:21:28 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Dawn M. Wolthuis (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 04:25:59 CET)
- Re: object algebra Dawn M. Wolthuis (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 04:27:54 CET)
- Re: Testing Various Data Models? Christopher Browne (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 05:10:12 CET)
- Re: Testing Various Data Models? Dawn M. Wolthuis (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 05:20:52 CET)
- Re: object algebra Marshall Spight (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 05:23:43 CET)
- Re: Testing Various Data Models? Marshall Spight (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 05:29:26 CET)
- Re: Tree (forest) design Marshall Spight (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 05:32:48 CET)
- Re: Codd provided appropriate mathematics ... (was Re: Relational and MV (response to "foundations of relational theory")) Marshall Spight (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 05:39:02 CET)
- Re: Testing Various Data Models? Dawn M. Wolthuis (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 05:39:24 CET)
- Re: Idea for concurrent transactions Marshall Spight (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 05:40:36 CET)
- Re: implementing a index for wildcard text search Jerome H. Gitomer (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 05:53:20 CET)
- Re: object algebra Bob Badour (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 03:51:28 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Bob Badour (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 03:58:46 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Bob Badour (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 04:04:15 CET)
- Re: Testing Various Data Models? Dan (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 08:14:26 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? Tony (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 11:55:07 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? Archibald Tuttle (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 12:08:30 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Archibald Tuttle (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 12:30:21 CET)
- Re: Testing Various Data Models? Archibald Tuttle (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 12:41:23 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Eric Kaun (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 14:24:38 CET)
- Re: Testing Various Data Models? Eric Kaun (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 14:36:15 CET)
- Re: object algebra Eric Kaun (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 14:40:30 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? Dawn M. Wolthuis (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 14:41:06 CET)
- Re: Testing Various Data Models? Dawn M. Wolthuis (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 15:33:25 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? Dawn M. Wolthuis (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 15:43:53 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Eric Kaun (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 17:17:35 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? Eric Kaun (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 17:20:43 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? Dawn M. Wolthuis (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 18:24:52 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Dawn M. Wolthuis (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 18:53:43 CET)
- Re: Idea for concurrent transactions --CELKO-- (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 19:25:11 CET)
- Re: Tree (forest) design Neo (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 20:06:46 CET)
- Re: Codd provided appropriate mathematics ... (was Re: Relational and MV (response to "foundations of relational theory")) Bob Badour (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 19:27:45 CET)
- Re: object algebra Neo (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 20:43:12 CET)
- Re: object algebra Neo (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 20:51:18 CET)
- Re: Codd provided appropriate mathematics ... (was Re: Relational and MV (response to "foundations of relational theory")) Mikito Harakiri (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 21:11:53 CET)
- Re: object algebra Eric Kaun (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 22:39:05 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Tom Hester (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 22:57:39 CET)
- Re: Testing Various Data Models? Marshall Spight (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 23:48:20 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? Marshall Spight (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 00:09:18 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Marshall Spight (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 00:19:24 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? Dawn M. Wolthuis (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 00:25:02 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? Dawn M. Wolthuis (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 00:32:12 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? Tony (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 01:12:09 CET)
- Re: Testing Various Data Models? Christopher Browne (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 01:52:34 CET)
- Re: implementing a index for wildcard text search Mike Preece (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 04:16:28 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Mikito Harakiri (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 20:03:14 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? ben brugman (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 21:34:47 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? ben brugman (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 21:45:30 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Eric Kaun (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 23:21:35 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Bob Badour (Fri Mar 12 2004 - 00:37:47 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? Bob Badour (Fri Mar 12 2004 - 00:39:32 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? Bob Badour (Fri Mar 12 2004 - 00:40:29 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Mikito Harakiri (Fri Mar 12 2004 - 01:19:26 CET)
- Re: Date, the relational model and the application (software layer) Dawn M. Wolthuis (Fri Mar 12 2004 - 02:50:52 CET)
- Re: object algebra Bob Badour (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 07:25:28 CET)
- Re: Codd provided appropriate mathematics ... (was Re: Relational and MV (response to "foundations of relational theory")) Bob Badour (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 07:27:54 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? Marshall Spight (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 10:16:57 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? ben brugman (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 10:27:32 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? ben brugman (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 10:31:28 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? ben brugman (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 11:50:02 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? Tony (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 12:00:42 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? ben brugman (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 13:11:12 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? ben brugman (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 13:26:26 CET)
- Re: Limit on the number of relations in a database Paul Vernon (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 11:18:37 CET)
- Re: Limit on the number of relations in a database Bob Badour (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 19:13:58 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Marshall Spight (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 19:15:30 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? Bob Badour (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 19:16:05 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? Bob Badour (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 19:18:35 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? Bob Badour (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 19:19:49 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Bob Badour (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 19:29:55 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? ben brugman (Fri Mar 12 2004 - 09:38:44 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? mountain man (Fri Mar 12 2004 - 15:08:47 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? ben brugman (Fri Mar 12 2004 - 15:43:49 CET)
- Re: Date, the relational model and the application (software layer) Eric Kaun (Fri Mar 12 2004 - 17:38:57 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Marshall Spight (Fri Mar 12 2004 - 17:49:21 CET)
- Re: Date, the relational model and the application (software layer) Eric Kaun (Fri Mar 12 2004 - 17:49:46 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Marshall Spight (Fri Mar 12 2004 - 17:54:32 CET)
- Re: Date, the relational model and the application (software layer) Bob Badour (Fri Mar 12 2004 - 19:14:28 CET)
- Re: Date, the relational model and the application (software layer) Bob Badour (Fri Mar 12 2004 - 19:17:32 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Bob Badour (Fri Mar 12 2004 - 19:19:25 CET)
- Re: Date, the relational model and the application (software layer) Eric Kaun (Fri Mar 12 2004 - 19:57:32 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Eric Kaun (Fri Mar 12 2004 - 20:01:01 CET)
- Re: Date, the relational model and the application (software layer) mountain man (Sat Mar 13 2004 - 09:54:51 CET)
- Re: Date, the relational model and the application (software layer) mountain man (Sat Mar 13 2004 - 09:54:52 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Marshall Spight (Sat Mar 13 2004 - 18:08:11 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Marshall Spight (Sat Mar 13 2004 - 18:30:35 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Marshall Spight (Sat Mar 13 2004 - 18:33:34 CET)
- Re: Testing Various Data Models? Mike Nicewarner (Sat Mar 13 2004 - 18:44:03 CET)
- Re: Idea for concurrent transactions Mike Nicewarner (Sat Mar 13 2004 - 18:44:40 CET)
- Re: Testing Various Data Models? Bob Badour (Sun Mar 14 2004 - 03:16:22 CET)
- Re: Date, the relational model and the application (software layer) mountain man (Sun Mar 14 2004 - 04:18:19 CET)
- Re: Date, the relational model and the application (software layer) mountain man (Sun Mar 14 2004 - 05:18:44 CET)
- Re: Testing Various Data Models? Mike Nicewarner (Sun Mar 14 2004 - 16:20:51 CET)
- Re: Testing Various Data Models? Bob Badour (Sun Mar 14 2004 - 21:31:50 CET)
- Re: Date, the relational model and the application (software layer) mountain man (Mon Mar 15 2004 - 11:46:17 CET)
- Re: Multiple specification of constraints Eric Kaun (Mon Mar 15 2004 - 15:21:25 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Hiran Chaudhuri (Mon Mar 15 2004 - 22:49:17 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Mikito Harakiri (Mon Mar 15 2004 - 23:07:09 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right mountain man (Tue Mar 16 2004 - 00:42:02 CET)
- Re: Date, the relational model and the application (software layer) Bob Badour (Tue Mar 16 2004 - 08:59:00 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Hiran Chaudhuri (Tue Mar 16 2004 - 20:43:20 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Hiran Chaudhuri (Tue Mar 16 2004 - 20:49:56 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Mikito Harakiri (Tue Mar 16 2004 - 20:53:15 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Mikito Harakiri (Tue Mar 16 2004 - 20:58:30 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Hiran Chaudhuri (Tue Mar 16 2004 - 21:03:56 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Hiran Chaudhuri (Tue Mar 16 2004 - 21:07:50 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Mikito Harakiri (Tue Mar 16 2004 - 21:19:34 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Christopher Browne (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 04:40:48 CET)
- Re: Idea for concurrent transactions Paul (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 13:44:17 CET)
- Re: Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? Paul (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 13:44:19 CET)
- Re: Date, the relational model and the application (software layer) Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 15:31:00 CET)
- Re: Date, the relational model and the application (software layer) mountain man (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 08:37:36 CET)
- Re: Idea for concurrent transactions Paul (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 12:22:31 CET)
- Re: Date, the relational model and the application (software layer) Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 14:33:45 CET)
- Re: Date, the relational model and the application (software layer) Christopher Browne (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 15:36:21 CET)
- Re: Idea for concurrent transactions Paul (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 19:56:15 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? SPeacock (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 01:48:47 CET)
- Re: "Y'All Bought Too Much Oracle": a review Bob Badour (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 02:00:34 CET)
- Re: ADO.NET Bob Badour (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 02:01:48 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Bob Badour (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 02:06:45 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Bob Badour (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 02:08:05 CET)
- Re: Testing Various Data Models? Dawn M. Wolthuis (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 04:07:59 CET)
- Re: Idea for concurrent transactions Anne & Lynn Wheeler (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 04:38:24 CET)
- Re: "Y'All Bought Too Much Oracle": a review Paul (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 10:14:51 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? Eric Kaun (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 14:35:31 CET)
- Re: Is this bad design ? Dawn M. Wolthuis (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 16:57:15 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Alfredo Novoa (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 19:21:58 CET)
- Re: ADO.NET Alfredo Novoa (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 20:00:06 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Tom Hester (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 20:08:40 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Mikito Harakiri (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 20:16:50 CET)
- Re: Idea for concurrent transactions Ed prochak (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 20:18:36 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Eric Kaun (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 21:05:53 CET)
- Re: "Y'All Bought Too Much Oracle": a review robert (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 22:26:57 CET)
- Re: "Y'All Bought Too Much Oracle": a review Mikito Harakiri (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 22:52:30 CET)
- Re: Date, the relational model and the application (software layer) Dawn M. Wolthuis (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 23:09:59 CET)
- Re: Any new thoughts on OTLT (One True Lookup Table) robert (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 05:42:11 CET)
- Re: "Y'All Bought Too Much Oracle": a review Lauri Pietarinen (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 13:55:33 CET)
- Re: Help needed with normalisation Bert Blink (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 22:38:24 CET)
- Re: Help needed with normalisation Mike Sherrill (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 00:08:21 CET)
- Re: "Y'All Bought Too Much Oracle": a review HungryLion (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 01:06:06 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Joe \ (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 03:02:15 CET)
- Re: "Y'All Bought Too Much Oracle": a review Tony (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 16:07:13 CET)
- Re: "Y'All Bought Too Much Oracle": a review Eric Kaun (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 15:25:27 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Eric Kaun (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 15:27:17 CET)
- Re: "Y'All Bought Too Much Oracle": a review Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 15:50:12 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Dawn M. Wolthuis (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 01:45:56 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Tony (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 11:01:40 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Eric Kaun (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 15:20:07 CET)
- Re: Prolog/Datalog as interface to RDBMSes? Tom Hester (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 18:52:22 CET)
- Re: "Y'All Bought Too Much Oracle": a review Paul (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 23:42:46 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Dawn M. Wolthuis (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 05:15:08 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Leandro Dutra (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 13:09:34 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Eric Kaun (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 16:14:07 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Mikito Harakiri (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 19:17:30 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Eric Kaun (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 21:31:13 CET)
- Re: How to code a supertype subtype relationship bogstonkott_at_netscape.net (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 22:18:55 CET)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Mikito Harakiri (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 22:26:59 CET)
- Re: How to code a supertype subtype relationship Mikito Harakiri (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 22:43:01 CET)
- Re: "Y'All Bought Too Much Oracle": a review Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra (Thu Mar 25 2004 - 00:26:42 CET)
- Re: Any new thoughts on OTLT (One True Lookup Table) Laconic2 (Fri Mar 26 2004 - 18:38:25 CET)
- Re: How to code a supertype subtype relationship bogstonkott_at_netscape.net (Fri Mar 26 2004 - 21:36:58 CET)
- Re: How to code a supertype subtype relationship Mikito Harakiri (Fri Mar 26 2004 - 22:22:21 CET)
- Re: Any new thoughts on OTLT (One True Lookup Table) Laconic2 (Sat Mar 27 2004 - 14:12:44 CET)
- Re: Any new thoughts on OTLT (One True Lookup Table) Laconic2 (Sat Mar 27 2004 - 14:38:21 CET)
- Re: Any new thoughts on OTLT (One True Lookup Table) Laconic2 (Sat Mar 27 2004 - 14:51:50 CET)
- Re: How to code a supertype subtype relationship Mike Sherrill (Sat Mar 27 2004 - 16:10:09 CET)
- Re: Database design/normal form conundrum robert (Sat Mar 27 2004 - 20:04:15 CET)
- Re: Database design/normal form conundrum Laconic2 (Sat Mar 27 2004 - 21:18:23 CET)
- Re: Database design/normal form conundrum --CELKO-- (Sat Mar 27 2004 - 23:30:30 CET)
- Re: Any new thoughts on OTLT (One True Lookup Table) Jerry Gitomer (Sun Mar 28 2004 - 06:30:54 CEST)
- Re: Any new thoughts on OTLT (One True Lookup Table) Laconic2 (Sun Mar 28 2004 - 20:34:57 CEST)
- Re: Where to discuss relational modelling? Laconic2 (Sun Mar 28 2004 - 20:51:49 CEST)
- Re: Creating a virtual OTLT (One True Lookup Table) Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra (Sun Mar 28 2004 - 22:18:49 CEST)
- Re: Where to discuss relational modelling? Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra (Sun Mar 28 2004 - 22:19:43 CEST)
- Re: Any new thoughts on OTLT (One True Lookup Table) Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra (Sun Mar 28 2004 - 22:26:15 CEST)
- Re: Any new thoughts on OTLT (One True Lookup Table) Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra (Sun Mar 28 2004 - 22:27:27 CEST)
- Re: Any new thoughts on OTLT (One True Lookup Table) Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra (Sun Mar 28 2004 - 22:28:13 CEST)
- Re: Primary Key Theory Question Bob Hairgrove (Mon Mar 29 2004 - 00:07:53 CEST)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Christopher Browne (Mon Mar 29 2004 - 06:09:29 CEST)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right Anne & Lynn Wheeler (Mon Mar 29 2004 - 06:48:39 CEST)
- Re: Any new thoughts on OTLT (One True Lookup Table) ben brugman (Mon Mar 29 2004 - 12:08:06 CEST)
- Re: Creating a virtual OTLT (One True Lookup Table) Laconic2 (Mon Mar 29 2004 - 13:21:23 CEST)
- Re: Any new thoughts on OTLT (One True Lookup Table) Laconic2 (Mon Mar 29 2004 - 13:37:17 CEST)
- Re: Primary Key Theory Question dataman (Mon Mar 29 2004 - 15:57:21 CEST)
- Re: Where to discuss relational modelling? Alan (Mon Mar 29 2004 - 16:43:57 CEST)
- Re: Primary Key Theory Question ben brugman (Mon Mar 29 2004 - 16:58:32 CEST)
- Re: Primary Key Theory Question Don Verhagen (Mon Mar 29 2004 - 17:30:40 CEST)
- Re: Primary Key Theory Question Tom Hester (Mon Mar 29 2004 - 18:16:55 CEST)
- Re: Primary Key Theory Question Eric Kaun (Mon Mar 29 2004 - 20:50:07 CEST)
- Re: Primary Key Theory Question Laconic2 (Mon Mar 29 2004 - 21:43:00 CEST)
- Re: Primary Key Theory Question Ben (Tue Mar 30 2004 - 04:00:34 CEST)
- Re: Primary Key Theory Question D Guntermann (Tue Mar 30 2004 - 05:55:07 CEST)
- Re: Xquery might have some things right D Guntermann (Tue Mar 30 2004 - 06:13:03 CEST)
- Re: Primary Key Theory Question Alfredo Novoa (Tue Mar 30 2004 - 12:48:49 CEST)
- Re: Object Class and Data Type Alfredo Novoa (Tue Mar 30 2004 - 12:55:48 CEST)
- Re: Primary Key Theory Question Tom Hester (Tue Mar 30 2004 - 17:09:07 CEST)
- Re: Object Class and Data Type Tom Hester (Tue Mar 30 2004 - 17:23:18 CEST)
- Re: Object Class and Data Type Alfredo Novoa (Tue Mar 30 2004 - 18:11:07 CEST)
- Re: Object Class and Data Type Tom Hester (Tue Mar 30 2004 - 19:21:43 CEST)
- Re: newby (very) question on XML DB theory ccc31807 (Tue Mar 30 2004 - 20:20:25 CEST)
- Re: Primary Key Theory Question Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra (Tue Mar 30 2004 - 22:30:33 CEST)
- Re: newby (very) question on XML DB theory Eric Kaun (Tue Mar 30 2004 - 22:26:35 CEST)
- Re: Any new thoughts on OTLT (One True Lookup Table) Laconic2 (Tue Mar 30 2004 - 22:34:56 CEST)
- Re: Is this bad design ? Laconic2 (Tue Mar 30 2004 - 22:35:24 CEST)
- Re: Primary Key Theory Question Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra (Tue Mar 30 2004 - 22:47:15 CEST)
- Re: Object Class and Data Type Neo (Wed Mar 31 2004 - 00:32:56 CEST)
- Re: Object Class and Data Type Neo (Wed Mar 31 2004 - 01:22:47 CEST)
- Re: Object Class and Data Type D Guntermann (Wed Mar 31 2004 - 01:29:09 CEST)
- Re: Object Class and Data Type Tom Hester (Wed Mar 31 2004 - 02:44:56 CEST)
- Re: How is this collection called? Rick Decker (Wed Mar 31 2004 - 03:59:46 CEST)
- Re: Any new thoughts on OTLT (One True Lookup Table) Laconic2 (Wed Mar 31 2004 - 05:19:48 CEST)
- Re: How is this collection called? Paul (Wed Mar 31 2004 - 10:06:09 CEST)
- Re: Object Class and Data Type Dan (Wed Mar 31 2004 - 10:40:12 CEST)
- Re: How is this collection called? Michael Mendelsohn (Wed Mar 31 2004 - 12:30:58 CEST)
- Re: Object Class and Data Type Alfredo Novoa (Wed Mar 31 2004 - 12:44:38 CEST)
- Re: Object Class and Data Type Laconic2 (Wed Mar 31 2004 - 14:45:04 CEST)
- Re: Where to discuss relational modelling? Laconic2 (Wed Mar 31 2004 - 15:10:30 CEST)
- Re: Object Class and Data Type Eric Kaun (Wed Mar 31 2004 - 16:02:05 CEST)
- Re: Object Class and Data Type Eric Kaun (Wed Mar 31 2004 - 16:13:42 CEST)
- Re: Object Class and Data Type Laconic2 (Wed Mar 31 2004 - 16:33:31 CEST)
- Re: Object Class and Data Type Tom Hester (Wed Mar 31 2004 - 17:38:01 CEST)
- Re: How is this collection called? Paul (Wed Mar 31 2004 - 18:35:11 CEST)
- Re: How is this collection called? Mikito Harakiri (Wed Mar 31 2004 - 20:29:07 CEST)
- Re: How is this collection called? Mikito Harakiri (Wed Mar 31 2004 - 21:05:25 CEST)
- Re: How is this collection called? Paul (Wed Mar 31 2004 - 23:40:35 CEST)
- Re: How is this collection called? Mikito Harakiri (Wed Mar 31 2004 - 23:45:32 CEST)
- Where can i find the original database rules from Codd? Tobias Faust (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 13:59:25 CET)
- Re: Codd provided appropriate mathematics ... (was Re: Relational and MV (response to "foundations of relational theory")) Tom Hester (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 18:00:48 CET)
- Can these constraint be implemented in an RDBMS ? ben brugman (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 22:16:33 CET)
- Last message date: Mon Mar 01 2004 - 00:37:47 CET
- Archived on: Sun Jun 26 2016 - 12:21:06 CEST
|
