Re: Xquery might have some things right

From: Mikito Harakiri <mikharakiri_at_iahu.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:53:15 -0800
Message-ID: <74J5c.21$YU2.90_at_news.oracle.com>


"Hiran Chaudhuri" <hiran.chaudhuri_at_lrz.fh-muenchen.de> wrote in message news:c37l80$bgl$1_at_wsc10.lrz-muenchen.de...
>
> "Mikito Harakiri" <mikharakiri_at_iahu.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:DXp5c.41$mN5.34_at_news.oracle.com...
> >
> > "Hiran Chaudhuri" <hiran.chaudhuri_at_lrz.fh-muenchen.de> wrote in message
> > news:c358aa$4n0$1_at_wsc10.lrz-muenchen.de...
> > > Or how do you implement RPC between a Java program and Cobol on
> > > mainframes on the other side? Either you use a middleware product, or
> you
> > > use XML. And guess what: Today middleware also supports XML
> communication.
> >
> > Wonderful definition. XML is a buzzware that allows to connect to legacy
> > COBOL systems.
>
> You misinterprete my expression. I said it can be used for that, so it was
> an example - not a definition.
> What's going on here?

How can it be used? Legacy COBOL systems have no idea about RPC, Java RMI, or SOAP. You have to write adapter on the COBOL communication side anyway. And Protocol can be anything. Received on Tue Mar 16 2004 - 20:53:15 CET

Original text of this message