Re: Xquery might have some things right
From: Hiran Chaudhuri <hiran.chaudhuri_at_lrz.fh-muenchen.de>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 21:03:56 +0100
Message-ID: <c37mbk$c56$1_at_wsc10.lrz-muenchen.de>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 21:03:56 +0100
Message-ID: <c37mbk$c56$1_at_wsc10.lrz-muenchen.de>
"Mikito Harakiri" <mikharakiri_at_iahu.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:74J5c.21$YU2.90_at_news.oracle.com...
> > You misinterprete my expression. I said it can be used for that, so it
was
> > an example - not a definition.
> > What's going on here?
>
> How can it be used? Legacy COBOL systems have no idea about RPC, Java RMI,
> or SOAP. You have to write adapter on the COBOL communication side anyway.
> And Protocol can be anything.
Replace the word Cobol with Natural, and the XML interface is real now. So what keeps you from believing that this is a possible way to go? The perhaps missing implementation? If you need it, I can build one.
Hiran Received on Tue Mar 16 2004 - 21:03:56 CET