Re: object algebra
From: Eric Kaun <ekaun_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 13:37:32 GMT
Message-ID: <wo%1c.55834$5N4.55215_at_newssvr33.news.prodigy.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 13:37:32 GMT
Message-ID: <wo%1c.55834$5N4.55215_at_newssvr33.news.prodigy.com>
"Tony" <andrewst_at_onetel.net.uk> wrote in message
news:c0e3f26e.0403050415.7de8b11b_at_posting.google.com...
> neo55592_at_hotmail.com (Neo) wrote in message
news:<4b45d3ad.0403041133.37b05942_at_posting.google.com>...
> > > Perhaps because TDM/XDb1 was created by someone who didn't have a firm
> > > grasp on normalisation, or perhaps even reality? ;)
> >
> > Perhaps, but could you devise an experiment related to representing
> > things, normalization and databases that would prove your conjecure?
>
> No, I think we have to invoke Date's Incoherence Principle here: It is
> not possible to treat coherently that which is incoherent.
Agreed. Received on Fri Mar 05 2004 - 14:37:32 CET