Re: Multiple specification of constraints
From: Eric Kaun <ekaun_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 13:40:09 GMT
Message-ID: <ZkG1c.30937$jE7.24188_at_newssvr16.news.prodigy.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 13:40:09 GMT
Message-ID: <ZkG1c.30937$jE7.24188_at_newssvr16.news.prodigy.com>
"Marshall Spight" <mspight_at_dnai.com> wrote in message
news:Lkx1c.37232$PR3.737328_at_attbi_s03...
> "Eric Kaun" <ekaun_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:eTs1c.55453$%S7.4251_at_newssvr33.news.prodigy.com...
> > A relational language will buy you that... I agree with Bob that
relations
> > are not necessarily anything to do with persistence, although persisting
> > them is useful for obvious reasons.
>
> Actually, I think that it's mostly me blowing that particular horn.
>
>
> Marshall
Ach, right-o. Sorry. Received on Thu Mar 04 2004 - 14:40:09 CET