Re: Multiple specification of constraints
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 16:08:04 -0600
Message-ID: <c2ato9$1kk$1_at_news.netins.net>
"Eric Kaun" <ekaun_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ZO52c.21283$bS2.21087_at_newssvr31.news.prodigy.com...
> "Dawn M. Wolthuis" <dwolt_at_tincat-group.com> wrote in message
> news:c2ahli$opr$1_at_news.netins.net...
<snip>
There is a lot to reply to in your message, but right now I have to catch Starsky & Hutch before the hubby reads any reviews. I'll just reply to this one statement now.
> Keep in mind that modeling data as functions requires some relationships
> between those functions (e.g. a full algebra).
It just requires functions that can apply to those functions. You have both relations and operators on those relations I just have functions (and functions on them). It's all functions, brother. Give me a functional database over a relational database any day. (no meat in that statement) smiles. --dawn Received on Fri Mar 05 2004 - 23:08:04 CET