comp.databases.theory: by thread

Re: Charades [Was: RE: Define "flatten database" ?] Dan (Tue Feb 01 2005 - 07:25:54 CET)
- Re: Charades [Was: RE: Define "flatten database" ?] Paul (Tue Feb 01 2005 - 14:30:30 CET)
  - Re: Charades [Was: RE: Define "flatten database" ?] DA Morgan (Tue Feb 01 2005 - 15:48:55 CET)
    - Re: Charades [Was: RE: Define "flatten database" ?] Paul (Tue Feb 01 2005 - 17:30:01 CET)
      - Re: Charades [Was: RE: Define "flatten database" ?] DA Morgan (Wed Feb 02 2005 - 18:15:08 CET)
  - Uneducated Ego-Puffed Idiot, Ignoramus, Troll Neo (Tue Feb 01 2005 - 21:08:15 CET)
    - Re: Uneducated Ego-Pu�ffed Idiot, Ignoramus, Troll Alan (Tue Feb 01 2005 - 21:50:39 CET)
      - Re: Uneducated Ego-Pu�ffed Idiot, Ignoramus, Troll Gene Wirchenko (Tue Feb 01 2005 - 22:39:16 CET)
    - Re: Uneducated Ego-Pu�ffed Idiot, Ignoramus, Troll Dawn M. Wolthuis (Thu Feb 03 2005 - 01:36:54 CET)
- Re: Charades [Was: RE: Define "flatten database" ?] Anith Sen (Tue Feb 01 2005 - 19:44:58 CET)
- Re: Charades [Was: RE: Define "flatten database" ?] Neo (Tue Feb 01 2005 - 22:47:32 CET)
- Re: Uneducated Ego-Pu�ffed Idiot, Ignoramus, Troll Hugo Kornelis (Wed Feb 02 2005 - 00:18:03 CET)
- Re: Charades [Was: RE: Define "flatten database" ?] Dawn M. Wolthuis (Wed Feb 02 2005 - 03:55:03 CET)
- Re: Charades [Was: RE: Define "flatten database" ?] DBMS_Plumber (Wed Feb 02 2005 - 06:30:50 CET)
- Re: Question about modeling David Cressey (Wed Feb 02 2005 - 15:43:24 CET)
  - Re: Question about modeling mathmoi (Thu Feb 03 2005 - 21:09:46 CET)
- Re: Normalization Question Marshall Lucas (Wed Feb 02 2005 - 22:43:22 CET)
- Re: Uneducated Ego-Puffed Idiot, Ignoramus, Troll Neo (Thu Feb 03 2005 - 03:35:13 CET)
- Re: Uneducated Ego-Pu�ffed Idiot, Ignoramus, Troll Alan (Thu Feb 03 2005 - 04:36:21 CET)
- Re: Normalization Question Neo (Thu Feb 03 2005 - 06:11:06 CET)
  - Re: Normalization Question Marshall Lucas (Thu Feb 03 2005 - 16:31:07 CET)
- Re: Normalization Question Neo (Thu Feb 03 2005 - 17:58:32 CET)
- Re: Normalization Question Neo (Thu Feb 03 2005 - 18:01:52 CET)
- Re: Views for denomalizing lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com (Fri Feb 04 2005 - 00:17:09 CET)
- Re: Views for denomalizing Dawn M. Wolthuis (Fri Feb 04 2005 - 03:29:43 CET)
- Re: Views for denomalizing Alan (Fri Feb 04 2005 - 05:18:29 CET)
- Re: Views for denomalizing Anith Sen (Fri Feb 04 2005 - 06:40:06 CET)
- Re: Views for denomalizing Jonathan Leffler (Fri Feb 04 2005 - 08:51:49 CET)
- Re: Views for denomalizing David Cressey (Fri Feb 04 2005 - 14:27:26 CET)
- Re: Views for denomalizing Alan (Fri Feb 04 2005 - 14:55:04 CET)
- Re: Views for denomalizing Alfredo Novoa (Fri Feb 04 2005 - 15:00:37 CET)
- Re: Views for denomalizing Alfredo Novoa (Fri Feb 04 2005 - 15:03:08 CET)
- Re: Views for denomalizing Alfredo Novoa (Fri Feb 04 2005 - 15:03:18 CET)
  - Re: Views for denomalizing lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com (Fri Feb 04 2005 - 21:25:16 CET)
- Re: Views for denomalizing Alfredo Novoa (Fri Feb 04 2005 - 15:03:25 CET)
- Re: Views for denomalizing Alan (Fri Feb 04 2005 - 15:27:56 CET)
- Re: Question about modeling David Cressey (Fri Feb 04 2005 - 15:29:25 CET)
- Re: Views for denomalizing Alfredo Novoa (Fri Feb 04 2005 - 16:15:23 CET)
- Re: Do you have any sugestion of a good book about modeling ? Mark D Powell (Fri Feb 04 2005 - 16:23:04 CET)
  - Re: Do you have any sugestion of a good book about modeling ? mathmoi (Fri Feb 04 2005 - 17:40:51 CET)
    - Re: Do you have any sugestion of a good book about modeling ? Mark D Powell (Sun Feb 06 2005 - 06:18:14 CET)
- Re: Views for denomalizing Dawn M. Wolthuis (Fri Feb 04 2005 - 17:12:28 CET)
- Re: Views for denomalizing Dawn M. Wolthuis (Fri Feb 04 2005 - 17:32:01 CET)
- Re: Question about modeling mathmoi (Fri Feb 04 2005 - 17:36:10 CET)
- Re: Views for denomalizing Dawn M. Wolthuis (Fri Feb 04 2005 - 17:48:53 CET)
- Re: Views for denomalizing Dawn M. Wolthuis (Fri Feb 04 2005 - 17:53:54 CET)
- Re: Do you have any sugestion of a good book about modeling ? -CELKO- (Fri Feb 04 2005 - 19:50:58 CET)
  - Re: Do you have any sugestion of a good book about modeling ? ak_tiredofspam_at_yahoo.com (Fri Feb 04 2005 - 21:46:54 CET)
- Re: Views for denomalizing Alan (Sat Feb 05 2005 - 04:30:53 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Dawn M. Wolthuis (Sat Feb 05 2005 - 15:36:28 CET)
- Re: Views for denomalizing Alfredo Novoa (Sat Feb 05 2005 - 22:03:59 CET)
- Re: Views for denomalizing Alfredo Novoa (Sat Feb 05 2005 - 22:03:46 CET)
- Re: Views for denomalizing Alfredo Novoa (Sat Feb 05 2005 - 22:03:42 CET)
- Re: Views for denomalizing Alfredo Novoa (Sat Feb 05 2005 - 22:04:16 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Alfredo Novoa (Sat Feb 05 2005 - 22:04:37 CET)
- Re: Views for denomalizing Alfredo Novoa (Sat Feb 05 2005 - 22:04:42 CET)
- Re: Views for denomalizing Dawn M. Wolthuis (Sun Feb 06 2005 - 01:24:22 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Alan (Sun Feb 06 2005 - 02:56:44 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Dawn M. Wolthuis (Sun Feb 06 2005 - 03:54:43 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Roy Hann (Sun Feb 06 2005 - 08:35:09 CET)
  - Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Paul (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 14:35:04 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Dan (Sun Feb 06 2005 - 08:53:14 CET)
- Re: Do you have any sugestion of a good book about modeling ? lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com (Sun Feb 06 2005 - 12:31:23 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Roy Hann (Sun Feb 06 2005 - 12:39:10 CET)
- Re: Charades Tom Ivar Helbekkmo (Sun Feb 06 2005 - 13:10:21 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Tony Andrews (Sun Feb 06 2005 - 15:32:22 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Alan (Sun Feb 06 2005 - 16:32:54 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Alfredo Novoa (Sun Feb 06 2005 - 16:36:49 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Alan (Sun Feb 06 2005 - 16:36:38 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Tom Ivar Helbekkmo (Sun Feb 06 2005 - 17:30:51 CET)
  - Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com (Sun Feb 06 2005 - 22:07:26 CET)
    - Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Paul (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 14:29:06 CET)
      - Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 14:55:44 CET)
        
        Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Paul (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 18:42:07 CET)
        
        Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 20:10:06 CET)
        
        Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Paul (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 21:16:56 CET)
        
        Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 22:54:14 CET)
      - Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads strider5 (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 14:57:35 CET)
        
        Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Paul (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 18:08:33 CET)
        
        Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads strider5 (Tue Feb 08 2005 - 09:14:19 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Alan (Sun Feb 06 2005 - 20:33:15 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Dawn M. Wolthuis (Sun Feb 06 2005 - 21:23:52 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Dawn M. Wolthuis (Sun Feb 06 2005 - 21:31:04 CET)
- Re: Views for denomalizing Anith Sen (Sun Feb 06 2005 - 21:37:51 CET)
- Re: Views for denomalizing David Cressey (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 01:18:45 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Neo (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 02:38:19 CET)
- Re: SQL Database design question William Cleveland (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 05:23:34 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Tom Ivar Helbekkmo (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 07:23:41 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads David Cressey (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 14:19:54 CET)
  - Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 14:35:21 CET)
- Re: SQL Database design question David Cressey (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 14:23:28 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Tom Ivar Helbekkmo (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 15:11:31 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Alfredo Novoa (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 15:45:18 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Alan (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 15:50:54 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Alan (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 16:08:04 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Alan (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 16:11:33 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Alan (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 16:49:09 CET)
  - Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Paul (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 17:56:07 CET)
  - Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads strider5 (Tue Feb 08 2005 - 09:30:56 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Alan (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 16:52:06 CET)
  - Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 17:20:30 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Alan (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 17:34:27 CET)
  - Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 17:54:27 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Alan (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 18:23:09 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Alan (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 18:27:58 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Dawn M. Wolthuis (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 18:40:12 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Alan (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 18:41:48 CET)
  - Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Paul (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 19:12:50 CET)
  - Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Dan (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 20:03:55 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Alan (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 19:06:50 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Alan (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 19:30:32 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Alan (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 19:40:35 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Dawn M. Wolthuis (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 19:51:23 CET)
  - Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Dan (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 20:11:59 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Dawn M. Wolthuis (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 20:31:26 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Dawn M. Wolthuis (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 20:44:02 CET)
  - Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 21:22:06 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads David Cressey (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 21:38:13 CET)
  - Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Paul (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 22:55:34 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Alan (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 22:25:27 CET)
- Re: SQL Database design question Erland Sommarskog (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 23:16:34 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Dan (Mon Feb 07 2005 - 23:57:07 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Alan (Tue Feb 08 2005 - 01:45:17 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Alan (Tue Feb 08 2005 - 01:54:29 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Dawn M. Wolthuis (Tue Feb 08 2005 - 03:08:19 CET)
  - Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com (Tue Feb 08 2005 - 06:09:20 CET)
    - Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com (Tue Feb 08 2005 - 07:29:19 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Dawn M. Wolthuis (Tue Feb 08 2005 - 03:23:43 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Dawn M. Wolthuis (Tue Feb 08 2005 - 03:27:33 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Dan (Tue Feb 08 2005 - 04:32:28 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Dan (Tue Feb 08 2005 - 14:12:23 CET)
- Re: SQL Database design question David Cressey (Tue Feb 08 2005 - 14:41:56 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Dan (Tue Feb 08 2005 - 14:51:28 CET)
  - Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads paul c (Tue Feb 08 2005 - 18:53:31 CET)
    - Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Dan (Tue Feb 08 2005 - 20:40:52 CET)
      - Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads paul c (Tue Feb 08 2005 - 22:54:03 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads David Cressey (Tue Feb 08 2005 - 14:52:49 CET)
  - Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com (Tue Feb 08 2005 - 19:52:59 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Alan (Tue Feb 08 2005 - 15:11:17 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Dawn M. Wolthuis (Wed Feb 09 2005 - 00:33:03 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Dawn M. Wolthuis (Wed Feb 09 2005 - 01:34:06 CET)
  - Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads paul c (Wed Feb 09 2005 - 06:12:24 CET)
- Re: Do you have any sugestion of a good book about modeling ? Mike Sherrill (Wed Feb 09 2005 - 04:14:27 CET)
- Re: Relation-valued attributes (again) x y (Wed Feb 09 2005 - 04:37:40 CET)
  - Re: Relation-valued attributes (again) jingleheimerschmitt_at_hotmail.com (Fri Feb 11 2005 - 10:12:58 CET)
- Re: Relation-valued attributes (again) Neo (Wed Feb 09 2005 - 06:55:03 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Alan (Wed Feb 09 2005 - 12:50:11 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Roy Hann (Wed Feb 09 2005 - 12:58:06 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads David Cressey (Wed Feb 09 2005 - 14:11:55 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Alan (Wed Feb 09 2005 - 14:56:05 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Dan (Wed Feb 09 2005 - 15:09:41 CET)
- Re: Pearson-r in SQL -CELKO- (Wed Feb 09 2005 - 15:19:52 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Alfredo Novoa (Wed Feb 09 2005 - 15:57:58 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Alfredo Novoa (Wed Feb 09 2005 - 16:00:08 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Alfredo Novoa (Wed Feb 09 2005 - 16:09:57 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Dawn M. Wolthuis (Wed Feb 09 2005 - 16:36:17 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Alan (Wed Feb 09 2005 - 16:38:05 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Alfredo Novoa (Wed Feb 09 2005 - 16:52:21 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Roy Hann (Wed Feb 09 2005 - 18:49:25 CET)
- Re: Views for denomalizing Alfredo Novoa (Wed Feb 09 2005 - 20:04:41 CET)
  - Re: Views for denomalizing lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com (Wed Feb 09 2005 - 20:12:23 CET)
    - Re: Views for denomalizing Jonathan Leffler (Thu Feb 10 2005 - 08:18:10 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Roy Hann (Wed Feb 09 2005 - 20:22:13 CET)
- Re: Views for denomalizing Dawn M. Wolthuis (Thu Feb 10 2005 - 03:20:18 CET)
  - Re: Views for demoralizing Jonathan Leffler (Fri Feb 11 2005 - 07:49:43 CET)
    - Re: Views for demoralizing Dawn M. Wolthuis (Fri Feb 11 2005 - 17:00:56 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Dawn M. Wolthuis (Thu Feb 10 2005 - 05:40:39 CET)
- Re: Views for denomalizing Alfredo Novoa (Thu Feb 10 2005 - 10:14:12 CET)
- Re: Views for denomalizing Alfredo Novoa (Thu Feb 10 2005 - 10:58:54 CET)
- Re: Views for denomalizing Dawn M. Wolthuis (Thu Feb 10 2005 - 14:19:09 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads David Cressey (Thu Feb 10 2005 - 17:44:10 CET)
  - Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com (Fri Feb 11 2005 - 00:01:24 CET)
- Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...) lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com (Fri Feb 11 2005 - 00:46:13 CET)
  - Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...) DBMS_Plumber (Fri Feb 11 2005 - 01:52:48 CET)
    - Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...) lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com (Fri Feb 11 2005 - 09:02:02 CET)
- Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...) paul c (Fri Feb 11 2005 - 02:09:09 CET)
  - Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...) Paul (Fri Feb 11 2005 - 11:29:25 CET)
- Re: So let me get this right: Christopher Browne (Fri Feb 11 2005 - 04:19:10 CET)
- Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...) Dawn M. Wolthuis (Fri Feb 11 2005 - 04:19:50 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads David Cressey (Fri Feb 11 2005 - 15:26:36 CET)
- Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...) David Cressey (Fri Feb 11 2005 - 15:57:44 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Dawn M. Wolthuis (Fri Feb 11 2005 - 16:19:50 CET)
- Re: Representation for Heterogeneous Attribute Set Erland Sommarskog (Sat Feb 12 2005 - 00:37:34 CET)
- Re: Views for demoralizing Mikito Harakiri (Sat Feb 12 2005 - 02:26:35 CET)
  - Re: Views for demoralizing Jonathan Leffler (Sat Feb 12 2005 - 10:14:33 CET)
    - Re: Views for demoralizing mikharakiri_nospaum_at_yahoo.com (Sun Feb 13 2005 - 07:10:19 CET)
- Re: Can we solve this -- NFNF and non-1NF at Loggerheads Alfredo Novoa (Sat Feb 12 2005 - 13:07:48 CET)
- Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...) Alfredo Novoa (Sat Feb 12 2005 - 13:08:58 CET)
- Re: Define "flatten database" ? Jan Hidders (Sat Feb 12 2005 - 15:07:21 CET)
- Re: Define "flatten database" ? Jan Hidders (Sat Feb 12 2005 - 15:29:26 CET)
- Re: Views for demoralizing Alfredo Novoa (Sat Feb 12 2005 - 16:58:05 CET)
  - Re: Views for demoralizing Jonathan Leffler (Sun Feb 13 2005 - 04:44:21 CET)
- Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...) Jan Hidders (Sat Feb 12 2005 - 17:12:10 CET)
- Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...) Jan Hidders (Sat Feb 12 2005 - 17:24:34 CET)
  - Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...) Paul (Sat Feb 12 2005 - 21:30:57 CET)
    - Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...) Jan Hidders (Sun Feb 13 2005 - 11:19:51 CET)
      - Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...) Paul (Sun Feb 13 2005 - 12:48:33 CET)
        
        Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...) Jan Hidders (Sun Feb 13 2005 - 15:12:51 CET)
- Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...) Jan Hidders (Sat Feb 12 2005 - 18:40:51 CET)
  - Relational lattice Vadim Tropashko (Sun Feb 13 2005 - 17:28:38 CET)
    - Re: Relational lattice Jan Hidders (Sun Feb 13 2005 - 19:10:40 CET)
- Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...) Jan Hidders (Sat Feb 12 2005 - 19:00:17 CET)
- Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...) Dan (Sat Feb 12 2005 - 22:39:00 CET)
- Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...) Dan (Sat Feb 12 2005 - 23:02:29 CET)
  - Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...) Jan Hidders (Sun Feb 13 2005 - 11:58:13 CET)
- Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...) David Cressey (Sun Feb 13 2005 - 13:28:55 CET)
  - Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...) Jan Hidders (Sun Feb 13 2005 - 15:41:09 CET)
- Re: Views for demoralizing Dawn M. Wolthuis (Sun Feb 13 2005 - 16:58:20 CET)
- Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...) DBMS_Plumber (Sun Feb 13 2005 - 20:05:06 CET)
- Re: Define "flatten database" ? Patrick (Mon Feb 14 2005 - 05:13:37 CET)
- Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...) David Cressey (Mon Feb 14 2005 - 14:17:01 CET)
  - Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...) DBMS_Plumber (Mon Feb 14 2005 - 18:52:15 CET)
  - Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...) Jan Hidders (Mon Feb 14 2005 - 23:36:33 CET)
    - Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...) DBMS_Plumber (Tue Feb 15 2005 - 00:29:29 CET)
- Re: Current Glossary & definition of Relation Amit (Mon Feb 14 2005 - 18:55:18 CET)
- Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...) Mikito Harakiri (Tue Feb 15 2005 - 00:50:03 CET)
- Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...) David Cressey (Tue Feb 15 2005 - 15:38:13 CET)
- Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...) David Cressey (Tue Feb 15 2005 - 16:02:47 CET)
- Re: Current Glossary & definition of Relation mikharakiri_nospaum_at_yahoo.com (Tue Feb 15 2005 - 18:16:13 CET)
- Re: Cardinality "highly unusual" Matt M (Wed Feb 16 2005 - 08:35:24 CET)
- Re: Database distant access Mark D Powell (Wed Feb 16 2005 - 16:15:41 CET)
- Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus Antonio Martinez (Wed Feb 16 2005 - 19:21:09 CET)
- Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus Mikito Harakiri (Wed Feb 16 2005 - 19:53:12 CET)
  - Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus Paul (Thu Feb 17 2005 - 01:39:00 CET)
- Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus Mikito Harakiri (Thu Feb 17 2005 - 02:21:54 CET)
  - Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus Vadim Tropashko (Thu Feb 17 2005 - 02:59:04 CET)
    - Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus Jan Hidders (Thu Feb 17 2005 - 23:27:40 CET)
- Re: User Defined Fields - HELP PLEASE! -CELKO- (Thu Feb 17 2005 - 16:07:32 CET)
  - Re: User Defined Fields - HELP PLEASE! John (Thu Feb 17 2005 - 16:58:02 CET)
    - Re: User Defined Fields - HELP PLEASE! -CELKO- (Fri Feb 18 2005 - 19:41:22 CET)
- Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...) David Cressey (Thu Feb 17 2005 - 16:38:22 CET)
  - Re: So let me get this right: (Was: NFNF vs 1NF ...) DBMS_Plumber (Thu Feb 17 2005 - 20:07:03 CET)
- What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus Mikito Harakiri (Fri Feb 18 2005 - 00:15:05 CET)
  - Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus Jan Hidders (Fri Feb 18 2005 - 00:30:52 CET)
  - Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus Paul (Fri Feb 18 2005 - 00:49:14 CET)
  - Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus Mikito Harakiri (Fri Feb 18 2005 - 01:12:27 CET)
    - Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus Jan Hidders (Fri Feb 18 2005 - 23:33:15 CET)
  - Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus Mikito Harakiri (Fri Feb 18 2005 - 01:30:56 CET)
    - Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus Paul (Fri Feb 18 2005 - 10:15:04 CET)
  - Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus David Cressey (Fri Feb 18 2005 - 14:40:10 CET)
  - Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus Mikito Harakiri (Fri Feb 18 2005 - 18:52:27 CET)
    - Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus Paul (Fri Feb 18 2005 - 20:08:03 CET)
  - Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus Mikito Harakiri (Fri Feb 18 2005 - 20:36:29 CET)
    - Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus Paul (Sat Feb 19 2005 - 13:02:49 CET)
      - Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus mikharakiri_nospaum_at_yahoo.com (Sat Feb 19 2005 - 19:02:27 CET)
  - Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus Mikito Harakiri (Fri Feb 18 2005 - 23:54:24 CET)
    - Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus Jan Hidders (Sat Feb 19 2005 - 00:19:11 CET)
    - Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus Vadim Tropashko (Sat Feb 19 2005 - 02:16:17 CET)
- Re: Relation Definition dwolt (Fri Feb 18 2005 - 01:27:42 CET)
  - Re: Relation Definition Jan Hidders (Fri Feb 18 2005 - 23:13:23 CET)
- Re: Relation Definition Alfredo Novoa (Fri Feb 18 2005 - 09:01:05 CET)
  - Re: Relation Definition Jan Hidders (Fri Feb 18 2005 - 22:33:50 CET)
- Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus Mikito Harakiri (Sat Feb 19 2005 - 02:47:26 CET)
  - Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus Vadim Tropashko (Sat Feb 19 2005 - 03:05:11 CET)
- Re: User Defined Fields - HELP PLEASE! Mike Sherrill (Sat Feb 19 2005 - 12:27:20 CET)
  - Re: User Defined Fields - HELP PLEASE! Mark D Powell (Tue Feb 22 2005 - 16:12:31 CET)
    - Re: User Defined Fields - HELP PLEASE! DA Morgan (Tue Feb 22 2005 - 19:51:07 CET)
      - Re: User Defined Fields - HELP PLEASE! Mark.Powell_at_eds.com (Fri Feb 25 2005 - 15:30:38 CET)
        
        Re: User Defined Fields - HELP PLEASE! DA Morgan (Fri Feb 25 2005 - 16:58:12 CET)
- Re: can two stored procedures in same transaction cause deadlock gnuoytr_at_rcn.com (Sat Feb 19 2005 - 23:51:05 CET)
- Re: Relation Definition Anith Sen (Sun Feb 20 2005 - 01:17:30 CET)
  - Re: Relation Definition Jan Hidders (Sun Feb 20 2005 - 12:22:29 CET)
- Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus Dawn M. Wolthuis (Sun Feb 20 2005 - 05:11:35 CET)
  - Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus Jan Hidders (Sun Feb 20 2005 - 13:57:57 CET)
- Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus Dawn M. Wolthuis (Sun Feb 20 2005 - 19:52:09 CET)
  - Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus Jan Hidders (Mon Feb 21 2005 - 00:48:36 CET)
- Re: Uneducated Ego-Puffed Idiot, Ignoramus, Troll Neo (Mon Feb 21 2005 - 03:36:59 CET)
- Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus Dan (Mon Feb 21 2005 - 04:58:20 CET)
- Re: Relation Definition Anith Sen (Mon Feb 21 2005 - 06:33:57 CET)
  - Re: Relation Definition Jan Hidders (Mon Feb 21 2005 - 23:26:29 CET)
- Re: Relation Definition Alfredo Novoa (Mon Feb 21 2005 - 16:12:58 CET)
  - Re: Relation Definition Jan Hidders (Mon Feb 21 2005 - 23:39:41 CET)
- Re: Relation Definition Alfredo Novoa (Mon Feb 21 2005 - 16:15:07 CET)
  - Re: Relation Definition Jan Hidders (Mon Feb 21 2005 - 23:18:52 CET)
  - Re: Relation Definition Jan Hidders (Mon Feb 21 2005 - 23:47:17 CET)
- Re: Relation Definition Alfredo Novoa (Mon Feb 21 2005 - 17:02:24 CET)
- Re: Relation Definition Anith Sen (Tue Feb 22 2005 - 03:14:53 CET)
  - Re: Relation Definition Jan Hidders (Tue Feb 22 2005 - 21:13:03 CET)
- Re: Relation Definition Dawn M. Wolthuis (Tue Feb 22 2005 - 04:36:51 CET)
- Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus Dawn M. Wolthuis (Tue Feb 22 2005 - 04:53:19 CET)
- Re: Relation Definition Roy Hann (Tue Feb 22 2005 - 09:53:05 CET)
- Re: User Defined Fields - HELP PLEASE! Alan (Tue Feb 22 2005 - 20:49:04 CET)
- Re: What is Aggregation? Re: grouping in tuple relational calculus Dawn M. Wolthuis (Wed Feb 23 2005 - 02:04:39 CET)
  - DTDs, specialized DTDs and XML Schema Jan Hidders (Wed Feb 23 2005 - 21:28:18 CET)
- Re: Relation Definition Anith Sen (Wed Feb 23 2005 - 03:31:33 CET)
  - Re: Relation Definition Jan Hidders (Wed Feb 23 2005 - 19:36:42 CET)
- Re: Problem with Nested Sets -CELKO- (Wed Feb 23 2005 - 19:28:02 CET)
  - Re: Problem with Nested Sets loufoque (Thu Feb 24 2005 - 00:48:27 CET)
    - Re: Problem with Nested Sets -CELKO- (Thu Feb 24 2005 - 16:20:16 CET)
- Re: User Defined Fields - HELP PLEASE! Eric Bohlman (Wed Feb 23 2005 - 19:59:37 CET)
  - Re: User Defined Fields - HELP PLEASE! Mark.Powell_at_eds.com (Fri Feb 25 2005 - 15:20:19 CET)
- Re: Relation Definition Dawn M. Wolthuis (Wed Feb 23 2005 - 20:17:00 CET)
  - Re: Relation Definition Jan Hidders (Wed Feb 23 2005 - 21:40:01 CET)
- Re: User Defined Fields - HELP PLEASE! Dawn M. Wolthuis (Wed Feb 23 2005 - 20:21:04 CET)
- Re: User Defined Fields - HELP PLEASE! Alan (Wed Feb 23 2005 - 21:18:07 CET)
- Re: Problem with Nested Sets loufoque (Thu Feb 24 2005 - 00:49:16 CET)
- Re: not enough rows, too many rows, and joins bugbear (Thu Feb 24 2005 - 10:58:38 CET)
- Re: not enough rows, too many rows, and joins bugbear (Thu Feb 24 2005 - 12:29:42 CET)
- Re: not enough rows, too many rows, and joins David Cressey (Thu Feb 24 2005 - 19:27:49 CET)
- Re: not enough rows, too many rows, and joins David Cressey (Thu Feb 24 2005 - 20:35:09 CET)
- Re: Problem with Nested Sets Neo (Fri Feb 25 2005 - 22:17:39 CET)
- Re: need some help paul c (Fri Feb 25 2005 - 22:35:13 CET)
- Re: Create new database -CELKO- (Sun Feb 27 2005 - 15:03:27 CET)
- Re: "thou shalt not conflate meta-data with data" DA Morgan (Mon Feb 28 2005 - 04:41:31 CET)
- Re: "thou shalt not conflate meta-data with data" Neo (Mon Feb 28 2005 - 20:30:59 CET)
- Re: "thou shalt not conflate meta-data with data" frosty (Mon Feb 28 2005 - 23:29:05 CET)
Re: SQL Database design question saghir.taj_at_gmail.com (Tue Feb 01 2005 - 12:33:12 CET)
Re: Question about modeling Dan (Tue Feb 01 2005 - 23:52:24 CET)

Last message date: Tue Feb 01 2005 - 23:52:24 CET
Archived on: Sun Jun 26 2016 - 15:26:03 CEST

11 messages sort by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ] [ subject ]
Other periods:[ Next, Thread view ] [ List of Folders ]
Nearby: [ About this archive ] [ Other mail archives ]